Search Results for:

Juggling data: knowing what to prioritize and why

Behind every great brand is a great bunch of researchers. 

These people bring together tools and teams, probably from across the globe, to inform key decisions and define how the business will look tomorrow. 

Take the tech sector, for example. They’re (unsurprisingly) no strangers to gathering and utilizing heaps of data, but there’s a caveat:

Can too much data from different sources be, well, unhelpful?

2020 taught us a lot, but the path ahead isn’t as clear as it might once have been. 

For those tasked with blazing a trail through the thicket of uncertainty ahead, we’ll show you how to prioritize your data sources, so at least that part’s easy.

Spoiler alert: it starts and ends with working smart.

The struggle is real for researchers

To make the right decisions consistently, you need good data.

But when there’s an overwhelming amount to sift through and limited time, it’s difficult to pull out those business-changing, golden nugget insights.

Susie Hogarth, Research and Cultural Insights Director, at We Are Social puts it well:

“Research and insight has to work harder and harder to be three things all at once; useful, insightful and agile. And it’s a real challenge for researchers to get the balance right.”

Prioritizing your data is a job in itself.

Researchers and analysts share a few common grumbles, so these might sound familiar.

 

Handling multiple data sets, tools and teams across regions.

Forget collaboration, you want cohesion. With marketing and business strategy teams (most likely) dotted across the globe, each with their own research techniques, half the job is agreeing on the right approach. 

 

Tracking the full consumer journey across regions and channels.

You might have some pretty slick first-party data, but that will only get you so far. To build a customer journey map that’s actually valuable, you want to look further than behaviors alone, and into what’s really driving them to take action (or not…). 

 

Getting answers quick using slow, traditional research methods.

In today’s landscape, you’re trying to stay nimble and adjust to changes on the horizon. Instead of trying to predict the future, you want to be reactive in the present.

 

Lacking a global view and an understanding of local markets.

When you have markets spanning multiple countries, you need local strategies. But devising a targeted plan of action requires visibility over each and every market.

 

What to prioritize when it comes to data

With so many moving parts to the modern research team, success is about organization, i.e. how well you use the tools at your disposal and how well you share that knowledge with others in the team.

But when it comes down to the types of data you use as your guiding light, there are some qualities that separate the wheat from the chaff.

 

Accuracy. Leave no room for error: If the aim of any research team is to help your leaders make the right calls, then using inaccurate data is as useful as a chocolate teapot. You want deep data that’s been scrutinized, so you can scrutinize it some more.

 

Speed. Get answers when it matters: Adjusting to unexpected bumps in the road is normal, but made more simple if you’re able to be reactive and prepared. 

 

Intuitiveness. It’s got to be simple to use: Market research and analysis isn’t ‘easy’, but the whole process can be made much more simple when the data tools you use don’t slow things down. A little bit of consistency goes a long way.

 

Reliability. Especially in times of crisis: During the pandemic, businesses want their sources to be bedrocks of reliability. After all, you invest in them to give you the answers you need.

 

Total harmonization. Link all your markets and channels: Perhaps the most important piece of the puzzle is your data’s adaptability. Harmonization means the data is all collected using the same methodology, no matter what region, country, channel or platform you’re looking at. Cross-compare at your leisure. 

 

Think of the above as a topline checklist – but factor in the context your business sits in and how you operate. Ultimately, teams working in silos isn’t helpful in the long term, so:  

Consolidate your tools and give them what they need to gather consistently accurate insights at speed.

Data harmonization in action: cross-comparing social platforms

Any company worth its salt has more first-party data than it knows what to do with. Very useful for looking back and seeing what’s worked, but not quite so useful when planning for the next chapter – especially in today’s climate.

In this example, we’re zoning in on one priority above to showcase how single-source (harmonized) data lets you compare channels like-for-like. Specifically, we’re looking at brand research on social platforms.

Remember: it’s not just channels you can compare, it’s regions, markets and audiences too.

Chart showing social media brand research

This simple chart shows popular platforms for brand research and the crossover between social networks. 

For example, 60% of people who search for information about brands on Pinterest, also look on Instagram. With this in mind, being selective about the social platforms you choose to invest in could lower your media spend.

Weave insights like these into your first-party data and you’ll have a rounded idea based on what’s working for your business, but also how your market is thinking and behaving.

Who’s doing it right? Match Media Group, that’s who.

Online dating tech titans, Match Media Group, were looking for answers on how the behaviors and attitudes of singles have shifted in the pandemic. 

Their priority was to put their consumers at the center of their new targeting strategy.

Using our coronavirus research (which focuses on the global consumer landscape), they built and applied their own audiences to pinpoint how these changes were affecting them.

A new trend they uncovered was the surge in video dating, or ‘dating from home’. 

Research revealed 31% of their audience on one platform was up for taking part in a shared activity.

This includes things like playing a trivia game or cooking together.

chart showing singles are interested in dating activities

“We use these insights to help our sales team go after new accounts or tell a better story as to how our consumers are behaving, thinking and buying”, says Divya Lakhati, Market Research Director at Match Media Group.

Having found out that shared activity was a top preference of today’s dater, it gave them licence to engage with relevant advertising partners for collaboration. 

Knowing what their users were looking for and pitching to advertisers that work in that space helped Match Media Group best serve their audiences in uncertain times.  

See the full story here.

Key takeaways

The truth is, if you work in sectors like tech, you’re always going to have to juggle data sources because you should always have first and third-party data. 

But juggling two data sets is easy.

When it comes to third-party data, there’s scope for saving energy and money by putting it all under one roof. This gives you:

  • More control: Be sure the data you’re using is accurate, and get better oversight over how you’re handling the data.
  • More consistency: Don’t waste time using multiple data sets, putting square pegs in round holes.  
  • Better collaboration: Make sure all teams are aligned, using the same processes and communicating effectively.
New call-to-action

The state of play: 5 things to know about sports in 2021

Last year was particularly challenging for the entire sporting world. 

COVID-19 forced many organizations to undergo changes in the way they operate to stay competitive. 

With the help of robust coronavirus testing, bubble living, and shuttered stadium doors, many teams and leagues were able to weather the storm.

All this hard work allowed sports fans to continue following their favorite teams even without being able to attend games in-person or gather to watch in a local bar. 

Many of the old fixtures of sports viewing, and sports fandom, have either been put on hold or changed beyond recognition. 

Using our newest dataset, GWI Sports, we put the focus squarely on sports fans. Specifically, how they’re watching, what they value in a team, how they’ve stayed engaged – and what it all might mean for the future.

1. COVID-19 may have curtailed appetite for live sport.

Around the world, stadiums are opening back up. Hundreds of millions of adults have already received a COVID-19 vaccine, and the question for many remains: when will sports return back to normal?

In some cases, the answer is now. A recent Australian Rules Football match saw attendance surpass 50,000 fans, and in India, the Narendra Stadium attracted a post-COVID record 66,000 fans for a T20 cricket match.

But these early examples mask the fact that most sports fans are wary of returning to the stands. For the most part, even though a solid portion said they missed attending games during the COVID lockdowns, the return of in-person fans may not be as strong as hoped for. 

chart showing COVUD may have a lasting impact on stadium attendance.

Around half of sports fans say that COVID has made them less likely to attend live events, so demand will need to be aggressively won back. 

Millennials pose a great opportunity for leagues looking to fill their stands with more regular fans.

This generation is not only more likely than the average to have missed sports during the pandemic, but also most likely to say they regularly attend games already, with nearly 70% of millennial sports fans attending a live match every 6 months.

2. Online sports viewership is on the up.

Time spent online has surged for many internet users over the past year. 

So, while sports organizations have a history of centering their partnerships around broadcast TV, there is a huge audience for fans who watch sport through digital channels, especially throughout the pandemic.

chart showing viewing is beginning to challenge broadcast TV

In every region of the world, the portion of consumers viewing matches on digital channels has been eating away at broadcast viewership. 

Online channels are beginning to threaten traditional ones, and in APAC, digital sports viewership has already overtaken broadcast TV – a significant milestone. 

This growth is predominantly driven by Gen Zs and millennials, and it’s an indication of how important it is to get younger fans on board, with so much viewing displaced to digital. 

As the number of digital sports services increases dramatically, from Hulu Live Sports to Amazon Prime and many league-specific services, like NFL Game Pass, we can expect this growth to continue.

The financial potential for digital sports services is also set to grow alongside the increasing purchasing power of younger sports fans. Three quarters of Gen Z sports fans say they’re willing to pay to access content from their favorite leagues. 

3. Social media content keeps fans engaged beyond match day.

Sports fans’ love of the game extends well beyond match day, increasing the scope of sponsorship opportunities. 

Commentary, highlights, and behind-closed-door access to teams, coaches, and players have long been staples of broadcast networks like ESPN and Sky Sports, but there are now many more ways fans can connect to the sports they love.

The pandemic pushed sports organizations to find new ways to connect with fans, and social media became the key channel to do so. Examples of this are plentiful, with Real Madrid’s content pivot epitomizing the trend. 

By doubling down on its highlights, Real Madrid was able to cater to fans who use their social feed as a second-screen, to act as a content provider in a time where digital sports content was being consumed in droves. 

Like most content on social media, sports content is geared heavily toward video, and user bases are driven in large part by younger viewers. 

YouTube is the top platform for sports fans globally, with over half of fans using the service to follow sports. 

This reaches as high as 60% among Gen Z sports fans.

The financial potential for brands and sponsors in the space is apparent, with over half of sports fans who use social media to follow sports also using social media to find new brands and products to buy. 

Many sports fans are regularly visiting company social media pages, watching branded videos, and livestreams. The latter has found unique success among sports fans, compared to typical social media users.

4. Virtual events are drawing a crowd. 

Although it started out as a niche market, esports is rapidly becoming a massive standalone industry. Amid the pandemic, and initial pause of live sporting events, many traditional sports fans have flocked to esports and other digital sporting content. 

Examples of successful crossovers between traditional and esports were numerous throughout lockdown, from NBA teams livestreaming NBA 2K games on Twitch, to Formula 1 partnering with Zoom to offer fans a virtual viewing experience. 

Events like these have increased esports popularity most among younger generations, who were craving competitive content. In July 2020, 18% of 16-24 year olds reported spending more time on esports during the pandemic.

In fact, the crossover between sports fans and esports fans is bigger than you might expect. Just under 60% of sports fans say they are extremely or very interested in esports. 

Further driving this trend forward is the financial upside – there’s a lot of money to be made in esports. Compared to traditional sports fans, these fans are actually more affluent, making them a very lucrative audience for sponsors and potential partners in the space. 

Chart showing Esports fans are very receptive to sponsorships

Many brands have caught onto this already, with high-value sponsorship deals tallying up to the millions. At the height of the pandemic, BMW announced new sponsorships of multiple esports teams, effectively shifting their long-term marketing strategy entirely to favor esports competitions. And more recently Red Bull – a longtime sponsor of extreme sports events – announced their own esports competition

5. Sports fans care a lot about CSR.

Sports fans, especially younger ones, place a great deal on the values their teams possess. 

In the past, sports teams could rely on a localized fanbase with new fans brought in as friends and family of already avid supporters. Yet younger fans today have a whole host of new expectations. Many new fans will only lend out their support if they feel a club represents their values. 

Younger fans are more likely to say that sports divides more than unites, and the onus has now fallen on leagues to work against that sentiment. Sports organizations have taken note of this, and 2020 was full of examples of teams and leagues working to be agents of good throughout the world.

Many stadiums worked with local governments to provide sites for COVID testing and vaccinating, and in the U.S., many leagues took political stances in the wake of country-wide racial justice protests. Most famously, the NBA went so far as to write Black Lives Matter on the court itself.

These kinds of political statements and community outreach reflect the values of sports fans. Nearly half of them say contributing to their community is important, and just under two-thirds say the same about helping the environment.

Sports brands that don’t actively work towards a better world for their fans run the risk of alienating their fanbase. 

It’s also important for sports brands to be genuine when it comes to their social welfare initiatives, as performative political or social statements without real action could actually lead to greater backlash.

sports data: woman holding basketball

Why the world needs better gaming data

The gaming industry’s set to exceed $200 bn in revenue in 2023. For anyone in it, this is no time to rest on your laurels.

But while gaming as a market gets plenty of attention, less is put on the diversity and intricacies of those who play. 

With the release of our latest data set, GWI Gaming, here’s why it’s well-needed – and what it can do.

What good gaming data looks like

Not all data is created equal. To get the best ROI on your market research, you need to get it from a source that delivers.

  • With harmonized research, the data’s collected across all demographics and regions using the same methodology. This way, you can mix and match your data in one platform, easily. 
  • The data can be as harmonized as it wants, but if it’s not detailed enough it won’t do the job. With thousands of data points at the ready, you can assemble personas and insights that reflect the real world.
  • Take your tracking to the next level with data that covers all the franchises, teams, leagues and events your audience loves.
  • With good data, you don’t get left behind. Go for sources that are consistently up-to-date, giving you a view of what gamers are actually doing and thinking right now.

The insights you need to engage

You may have the most engaged audience of gamers in the world, but if you’re marketing to them in the wrong place, in the wrong way, and at the wrong time, you’re only halfway there.

The battle for recognition and approval might be over, but now you need to give them the final push and drive those sales you want.

You already know unsolicited, uninspired ads and products will get you nowhere. With rich gaming data, you can pinpoint what they really want to see from you, and how to make it happen.

So what should you focus on?

1. Brand advocacy and engagement. Know what attracts your fans to your brand and others to nail down the product strategy and messaging that’ll get you results. What motivates and frustrates them when playing games?

2. Purchase drivers. They’re at the end of the funnel – don’t let them turn back now. Study which factors turn a ‘nah, maybe later’ into a ‘hell yeah, let’s do it’.  

3. Advertising preferences. What ads and formats does your audience normally engage with? Which ones do they hate? 

A good gaming data set allows you to combine attributes. For example, layer fans who (1) follow teams/leagues/brands on social media over (2) those likely to buy a product related to their favorite gaming franchise. 

You now have a view of those most likely to buy from a gaming brand they love – and you can make it even sharper by adding dozens more attributes to create complete audience personas.

Gamers don’t fit a mold – they fit hundreds

To drive sales from gamers, you’ve got to know the person in front of the screen – now more than ever.

And to know what drives them to engage with brands through their interest in gaming, you need to know their outlooks, perceptions, self-perceptions and attitudes. 

That’s where good data joins the game – and reveals the emotional, human things that make your personas come to life.

These are some of the things to look at. 

1. Lifestyles

Gamers are a diverse group, spread across regions, ages, genders, and much more. To get a basic understanding of your audience, lifestyle is the place to start.

  • What are their spending habits?
  • What means the most to them in life?
  • Where do they spend their spare time?

2. Attitudes

Attitudes shape choices of all kinds – bringing in the need for psychographic data. There’s always an emotion behind a purchase, and knowing what that emotion is and where it stems from makes shaping the right message as easy as pie.

  • Is value more important than luxury?
  • What place do they think gaming has in society?
  • What do they get out of gaming?
  • Do they want brands to focus on environmental aspects?

3. Perceptions 

While attitudinal data gives you the lowdown on how your audience feels, perceptions show you how they see themselves.

  • Would they describe themselves as confident?
  • Are they ambitious?
  • Do they see themselves as great gamers?

Case study: Fnatic – Telling the right story with better data

Established in 2004, Fnatic is a founding father of the esports industry, helping to shape the future of sports entertainment.

For Craig Santicchia, Partnerships Manager at Fnatic, educating businesses on the exciting world of esports is a top priority, and a key challenge.

Consumer data is vital for his team to provide best-in-class account management and establish partnerships with brands that align with Fnatic as the company scales.

But they needed something else – something more.

Challenge: Getting insight, not just data

“When I first started at Fnatic about a year and a half ago, we had very limited data,” says Craig. “We had the big, grand numbers that everyone in the industry had seen. 

“What was missing was the real insight.”

Craig saw this as an opportunity to help differentiate Fnatic from the competition.

“The world of esports can be seen as a murky, new world, ” he says. “We spend a lot of our time educating brands about the industry, Fnatic and its place in the ecosystem. Fnatic is a world-leader with over 55 million fans worldwide, but not everyone knows that.”

The action: Telling a better story

Having access to deeper consumer insight enabled Fnatic to tell their story with greater confidence. It brought the conversation to life for prospects while offering solid commercial context in the exciting, yet unfamiliar world of esports.

This allowed the company to pitch for new businesses in previously unexplored verticals.

“We give them the information and insight that they want to see as well as what is most relevant for them. We then introduce how our assets and services will help them gain access to the highly valuable and engaged esports audience.”

The result: Gaining client trust with credible insight

The insights-driven approach to pitching was a turning point for Fnatic, and has resulted in them securing new business deals with some very high profile brands.

One of the biggest partnership wins came in the form of a global CPG brand, after the Fnatic team reached out with an opportunity identified from the data.

“We used GWI to paint a picture of the opportunity around snacks in particular as well as behaviors within the audience.”

Because the brand already used GWI themselves, they knew the data was credible.

“If it wasn’t for GWI, we wouldn’t have been able to do that deal. It was integral, not just valuable.

Now when we pitch, we feel like we’re giving valuable insight into the audience.

This ensures we’re better prepared than we could have ever been previously.”

Sell smart, not generic

The gaming world comes with loyal and dedicated fans, but on the flipside they have high demands and expectations.

For many, gaming goes beyond an interest and trickles into lifestyle, making the experience more emotionally charged than many industries.

To convert this audience, generic, one-size-fits-all messaging has to be thrown out and replaced with a smarter strategy. Listen to what gamers are saying, and you’ll hear what they want from you.

Connect with consumers: a picture of devices and consumers in 2021

Social media marketing: 4 trends to double-tap on

Events across 2020 showcased the true power of social media.

Widespread lockdowns made the connections social media provides – between friends, businesses, and content providers – more important than ever. 

Social platforms have also evolved into a key vehicle for activism, with some businesses paying the price for taking their eye off the ball. 

Brands can’t sit on the sidelines of wider conversations, nor can they miss the chance to forge genuine connections with their customers. Luckily, the social space is evolving to accommodate these demands. 

Livestreams, online communities, and influencers all offer fresh ways for companies to convey personality, while entertaining their target audience. And with content now a key battleground for consumer loyalty, brands should strive to bring something new to the table. 

Here, we explore four of last year’s standout social media trends to see how they’ve progressed.

1. Gen X and boomers have joined the party. 

A key question on everyone’s lips is whether lockdown increases in usage are going to be sustained in the new normal.

There was a universal uptick in time spent on social media during Q2 (April-June) as countries went into lockdowns. The global figure then fell, before stabilizing.

Spikes in usage were ultimately one-offs, and we’ve since returned to pre-pandemic levels. 

Chart: Uptick in social media usage

Age plays a part, however. Younger consumers still spend the most time on platforms, but their initial increases were the first to settle down.

In contrast, boomers continue to use social media more than they did at the start of last year, with their Q2 peak largely being maintained. Partly due to their purchasing power, this group’s heightened presence on social sites is now being addressed by marketers.

Pre-pandemic, older consumers’ usage was pretty much synonymous with YouTube and Facebook; but across 2020, the portion of boomers using Instagram and Twitter grew considerably. 

While boomers are spending more time on platforms and maintaining a broader presence, they’re not necessarily more receptive to social media marketing. 

Compared to their younger counterparts, boomers in the U.S. and UK are more likely to describe social ads as excessive or intrusive; and low levels of connection with the content drive these sentiments. 

Only 10% of boomers say they feel represented in ads.

Boomers are far less likely to describe ads they typically see on social media as relevant. 

Some luxury brands are waking up to the problem and finally chasing the potential. Footwear company UGG is using a 65-year-old supermodel to front its upcoming Spring/Summer campaign; while others have collaborated with boomer influencers in fitness, fashion, and lifestyle categories. 

Our recent travel research shows that boomers are the most likely to have booked a trip for 2021, due to them being vaccinated first and typically having more disposable income than youths.

If travel is any indication, older consumers will be spending more, and more quickly, than audiences often targeted in advertising.

Brands who rethink and broaden their ad spend are the ones that stand to benefit. 

Many Gen Xs and boomers want to stay active and trendy, and thanks to the pandemic, they’re more reachable on social media than in the past.

Depicting relatable role models will break down old stigmas and encourage this audience to respond more positively to social media ads – prompting more sales and brand loyalty in the process.

2. The tide has changed for influencers. 

In light of the challenges posed during the pandemic, we’ve touched on how demand is increasing for more authentic and representative influencer marketing

Nowadays, the consequences of failing to read the room can be severe. A group of influencers came under serious fire in January after they traveled to Dubai under the label of “essential” work.

Consequently, several reality stars lost thousands of followers, causing some to speculate about the kind of place influencers have in our post-pandemic world. 

This obstacle aside, our data demonstrates the strong hold they have on consumers, particularly younger generations. 

27% of Gen Zs say following influencers is one of the main reasons they use social media, ahead of seeing content from their favorite brands. 

Especially now physical retail has taken a backseat and mental health is suffering, influencers are needed to help brands engage with customers in a more human, empathetic, and personal way.

Writer Chloe Combi argues 2020’s ideological shifts caused young people to shift their focus onto “true role models” and away from polished influencers.

This aligns with several aspects of our data; in Q4 2020, influencer followers were much more likely than other consumers to say challenging themselves, learning new skills, and contributing to their community was important to them. 

Influencer followers also have interests beyond travel and beauty. They stand out for being interested in personal healthcare, wildlife, DIY, and volunteering.

The gap between personal healthcare (58%) and beauty/cosmetics (45%) is actually wider among influencer followers than the average, which highlights their focus on wellness and self-care. 

So it’s not that influencers have less potential, but that followers want more raw, unfiltered content, which they currently relate to better than glitzy backdrops.

Influencers that offer lifestyle tips and encourage people to open up and express their frustrations, while voicing their own, stand a better chance of engaging followers in a meaningful way. 

3. Livestreams are empowering online communities.

The pandemic created a gap for virtual live events to fill, as many began craving human connection and entertainment.

In the same way users in Reddit communities or Facebook groups share similar interests, livestreams tend to attract like-minded crowds. 

Those who cite livestreams as a top use-case for social networking often seek out like-minded communities to a much greater degree than the average social media user (37 vs. 22%). 

They’re also 56% more likely than other social users to say they want brands to run customer communities, with just under half also longing for companies to make them feel valued and improve their knowledge or skills. 

Livestreams are a great opportunity for brands to provide value beyond their products, and leverage company expertise to make their customers’ lives better. 

China has been the trend-setting country for livestreaming in the last couple of years.

Around a quarter of those who visit shopping website Taobao each month cite live product demos as a leading purchase driver. In fact, Taobao Live created a precedent for WeChat and Douyin (TikTok), who quickly integrated this feature into their platforms. 

In the West, this pattern is somewhat reversed. Social platforms were among the first to invest in livestreams, followed by ecommerce companies like Amazon.

Unlike in China, livestreaming isn’t currently heavily associated with buying and selling, which gives businesses the opportunity to shape consumer perceptions of these experiences. 

As the community aspect is something current engagers value, brands can focus on ensuring their live events drive social interaction and a sense of belonging by giving viewers the chance to participate through activities like Q&As.

Selecting relevant hosts is also key to building trust, and will encourage people to open up and feel connected to a company.

At the end of the day, accessing an engaged group of customers should be high on the agenda for any organization, and livestreams – in conjunction with online groups and communities – offer the means to achieve this.

4. Content placement should be selective (not pervasive).

Having online communities helps brands support their customers in real-time, and how these interactions are managed is more important than where they take place.

Big companies like Walmart, Chipotle, and the NBA (who have the luxury of large advertising budgets) are the pioneers of TikTok marketing.

And we’re seeing similar things happen with Clubhouse, as well-known companies like Pernod Ricard and Restaurant Brands International (RBI) rush to make early investments.

Yet, smaller businesses with lesser budgets don’t need to feel anxious about maintaining a limited social media presence.

They don’t need to be everywhere at once, as while new sites have a unique set of usage motivations, these aren’t exclusive to any one platform. 

Chart: brand research on social media

Pinterest is increasingly gaining the attention of marketers. Many of the platform’s users log on the site for lifestyle inspiration, making brand discovery a lot more likely. 

But there’s considerable overlap when it comes to citing brand-related research as a use-case: 60% of Pinners who say they use the site to find brand-related information also visit Instagram for the same reason.

Ultimately, brands are better off managing a few platforms well rather than neglecting additional accounts.

Modest marketing budgets can still capture all kinds of user intent across the more tried and tested platforms.

New features introduced by up-and-coming platforms typically inspire similar changes on the more traditional networks, so they end up being accessible to the majority on social media.  

Reels and Shorts (inspired by TikTok) have enabled Instagram users to enjoy a stream of personalized clips, and several technology giants are trialing audio-based features of their own off the back of Clubhouse’s success. 

By being consistent and taking advantage of the latest tools in livestreaming, influencer marketing, and social commerce on a few hand-picked platforms, brands stand the best chance of amplifying their message to an attentive audience of loyal and potential customers. 

access our Social media report

Why TV ads are still king

Media consumption changes have attracted a lot of interest recently. 

We’ve long known about the explosive rise of time spent on mobiles (globally, GWI’s data shows an increase from about an hour per day spent on mobiles back in 2012 to more than 3.5 hours now). 

We’re all very aware that social media now captures a significant chunk of time (almost 2.5 hours daily). 

We all recognize that digital entertainment formats continue to become more prominent within the consumer’s life – with time spent on podcasts, music streaming and TV streaming all posting year-on-year growth.

Consumers are devoting their time to an ever-more diverse portfolio of devices and formats, so it can be tempting to assume that traditional formats must have lost some of their shine. 

Mass digitization during the pandemic has only fueled these assumptions.

Now that eyeballs are spread across more screens and more places, how could longer-established formats continue to command the same level of attention? And by extension, how could the ads they carry still wield the same efficacy? 

It’s a logical theory, but what does the data say? 

Diversifying media isn’t killing TV

Linear/broadcast TV has certainly been under pressure, with a gentle downward trend in the amount of time spent on it daily; the average global consumer now watches just under 2 hours per day, a decline of about 25 minutes compared to the early 2010s. 

While almost everyone continues to watch at least some live broadcast TV, the devices that they’re using have diversified.

While a traditional TV set remains the top choice (64%), just over half of consumers globally are using alternative devices – with a mobile (33%), PC/laptop (25%) and then tablet (11%) being the most popular. 

Meanwhile, a quarter of global broadcast TV users are not watching via a television set at any point in a typical month, a trend which increases in line with age to be twice as common among 16-24s as 55-64s. In turn, the notion of households sitting in front of their television for the evening has been challenged. 

TV’s dominance can’t be ignored

Broadcast TV still accounts for more time than any other entertainment behavior. 

It also continues to post very high figures in some key demographics and parts of the world, particularly from an advertising perspective.

Consumers in the U.S. spend more time watching television each day than their counterparts in any of the other 46 countries tracked by GWI (nearly 3 hours daily – putting it considerably ahead of time spent on social media in the U.S.). 

It’s reflective of broadcast TV maintaining a stronghold in North America and much of Western Europe. 

By age, the ongoing power of linear TV among older groups is plain to see. Boomers still watch almost 3 hours of broadcast TV daily, three times the figure they spend on streaming. 

Western countries have older population skews and there’s typically a disproportionate wealth distribution among older groups. 

As long as boomers are a considerable force in the consumer market, TV will be one of the best ways of accessing this spending power.

Even among Gen Z – often seen as the trendsetters of media consumption behaviors – both formats capture equal amounts of time, at around 1.5 hours daily.

Very clearly, then, online streaming isn’t replacing broadcast TV. 

Rather, consumers have a more diverse entertainment portfolio and this is driving increases in the overall time spent on media consumption. 

The evolution of the formats and devices we engage with has opened up more times and opportunities across the day – but broadcast TV remains a fundamental part of our behaviors. 

TV ads are the most favored 

Consumers have different tolerance levels for ads in various locations. 

As we covered in part I of this series, GWI’s research shows consumers in the U.S. and UK feel that TV ads are less excessive than those found online, and much less intrusive. 

In fact, when both positive and negative adjectives are combined into a composite score, we start to understand just how much more favorably TV ads are viewed compared to other ad formats.

This is a trend which transcends demographics.

By age, for example, TV ads come top for all groups but it’s among older segments where they establish the strongest positive differentiator vs other ad formats (and remember, this demographic are the heaviest engagers). 

It’s a similar story among other audiences. 

We see more positivity towards TV ads vs other media among those who are explicitly anti-advertising (avoiding it where they can) right through to those who are more positive towards it (feeling that they are represented in advertising). 

Whoever your target audience is, they are likely to approach TV ads with greater relative positivity.    

TV ads play by different rules

Clearly, TV ads are doing something right.

One way of exploring this is to dig deeper into the positive scores to see how they differ between ad formats.

When we do this, a plain distinction emerges: TV ads are appealing because they have the ability to entertain, whereas the other formats tend to be seen as beneficial when they provide relevant information.

We need to put this in context. 

We live in a world where, like it or not, advertising isn’t exactly at the top of peoples’ interests and agendas. 

The average person doesn’t spend their time looking for ads which catch their eye. Ads are something we live with, and we’re exposed to them throughout the day in many environments. Sometimes, they make a connection or a positive impression. 

In their ability to entertain, TV ads have gained a level of acceptance which stands far above that of other formats, even among people who are actively avoiding any type of advertising.

The lower positivity scores for other formats and the need for them to be informative to make a positive impression tells us a lot. 

It tells us that while the other formats are still indispensable in any ad campaign, compared to TV their effectiveness is much more reliant on how strategically they’re used in the buyer’s journey. 

Information needs will change at different stages of the journey, and seeing as irrelevant content is the third-leading cause of negative brand impressions caused by ads, the stakes are likely to be higher for these formats.

It also tells us that other formats can’t take the place of TV as the workhorse in brand building, and that while many advertisers might be hopeful for greater personalization – even in more traditional mediums – this isn’t necessarily what people are crying out for in regards to TV ads.

Check our our entertainment trends report

What do consumers actually think of ads?

No one in advertising needs reminding of how tumultuous the past 12 months have been.

A year when global ad spend fell by around 10% amid the economic fallout of COVID-19.

To align with new habits under lockdown, budgets have been shifted into more mobile-friendly digital media. Traditional channels have taken a hit. 

But consumers still value traditional ads, and brands would be unwise to assume they’ve become stale.

What’s more, while first- and third-party data offers brands unparalleled targeting opportunities, it struggles to answer all their questions. For example:

  1. What do different age groups want from ads?
  2. What are the most effective kinds of media?
  3. Why is online attention so expensive?
  4. How can brands be certain their ads are driving consumer behavior?

Using our survey-led research we’ve been able to fill this void.

Gen Z are the most demanding.

Key to any advertising campaign is zeroing in on your target audience. And, more often than not, this is drawn along generational lines.

What consumers look for in an ad is heavily dependent on their age.

What do consumers sant ads to do

All in all, younger consumers have a more diverse list of expectations when it comes to advertising. Most notably, they show signs of wanting to connect with an ad on an emotional level.

Their older counterparts on the other hand, are drawn to the functional, more tangible, benefits of ads.

Gen X and baby boomers are considerably more likely to want ads to give them product information or provide discounts. In comparison, Gen Z are more likely to want ads to be entertaining (42%) than informative (40%).

And Gen Z’s demands don’t stop there. This generation is driving the call for ads to promote social and environmental causes, and brands can’t afford to be complacent. As McKinsey Associate Partner, Emma Spaganuolo explains:

“You can’t talk about sustainability if you’re not doing sustainable practices. In the past you could hide by selecting and choosing what you wanted to show to the public – today everything is fair game.”

Over a third of Gen Z want ads to be relevant to their identity, key to that is brands being authentic and staying true to their promises.

Traditional media remains relevant.

Declining viewership means the death of TV is close – or at least, that’s what some commentators would have us believe. But even in this post-COVID digital age, broadcast TV remains more popular than its online alternative. 

But it’s not just its popularity that makes TV so appealing to advertisers, it’s the way in which it provokes an emotional response from consumers. 

How do consumers describe different ad types

Compared to online ad formats, TV ads are more likely to be described as “diverse”, “memorable”, “funny”, or “entertaining”, while they’re less likely to be associated with negative adjectives like “intrusive” or “excessive”.

Email marketing is another format that’s valued by many consumers.

Often described as “relevant”, “helpful”, and “informative”, while emails don’t provoke the emotional factor seen with TV, they’re ideal for the information-hungry older consumer.

On the other hand, social media is the most likely advertising medium to be associated as personalized – something we’ve noted Gen Z are looking for.

Across the board, consumer sentiment toward website ads is largely negative.

While shifts to mobile-first have been happening with greater speed over the last year, brands should not forgo the power of traditional advertising.

Younger people are easily distracted online.

Consumer attention online is limited, something marketers are only too well aware of. And attention from young people is the hardest to capture.

Prone to distractions, they’re often most costly to reach.

How do consumers use their phones

The data confirms that younger consumers often check their phone every few minutes, or that mobile is their preferred device. But, we need to explore in more detail how exactly these devices are used, and how attention works.

While young consumers are present, they’re very likely to be easily distracted by notifications or to regularly switch between different ads. 

Ultimately, they’ll rarely give an advertisement the prolonged attention it requires to drive their behavior. 

So brands often pay for huge advertising campaigns, knowing that only a small proportion of their target audience will actually pay attention to the ad, let alone click on it.

Direct Line is an example of a brand who’ve experienced this recently. The insurer relaunched its Churchill brand with a social media plan to reach younger audiences.

After assessing factors such as viewability, view-through rates, and consumer attention, Direct Line Group achieved less than 0.1% of the desired incremental reach across Facebook, Spotify, and Twitter.

As Karl Ward, Direct Line’s Marketing Effectiveness Manager concludes, “[social media] plays its part, but it’s not a TV-like channel, and shouldn’t be used like TV. It’s more like OOH”.

Providing information is key to driving consumer behavior.

Brands that know exactly what consumers are after are best set to get their attention and convert this into actionable behavior – whether that’s further research or making a purchase.

By profiling consumers who’ve done a specific ad-related action in the last week, we’re able to determine what they want ads to do for them, and see what brands need to do to drive this behavior.

Among consumers who’ve purchased something from an ad in the last week, 55% say they want ads to teach them something new and 46% want them to be entertaining.

By contrast, among consumers who watched an entire online video ad in the last week, these percentages switch positions.

In other words, online video is key for capturing consumer attention while informational content is more likely to drive sales.

But this isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach. Ultimately, it’s dependent on a number of factors including the type of product or service, brand identity, and target audience.

For example, a recent study found that it’s among low-quality and low-priced products specifically that emotional content increases brand awareness, while informational content leads to increased sales.

While brands must consider their specific industry, this analysis has opened up a way to design ads that promote specific and favorable consumer behaviors.

Ads need to be more relevant.

For brands, getting advertising right is an ongoing battle for perfection, but they also need to ensure they manage against getting it wrong as well.

Ultimately, producing too many ads can be very damaging for a brand. Instead, they should focus on appealing to consumer expectations rather than bombarding them with unwanted clutter that’s unlikely to pique their interest.

And consumers are showing signs they’re willing to work with brands to make this happen. 

Irrelevant ads paint a more negative picture of a brand than ads that seem to know us too well. 

So while data concerns remain high, this suggests consumers are willing to accept that brands have access to their data so long as their ads – while still intrusive – are at least relevant.

Some commentators, such as the FT’s Elaine Moore, claim that the potential relevance of targeted advertising has been exaggerated by the likes of Google and Facebook. 

On the other hand, while accepting that brands struggle to explain the benefits to customers, L’Oréal’s CMO, Stéphane Bérubé, would disagree:

“From a marketing industry standpoint, we may have not done a very good job in the past of explaining why data can bring relevancy and content that is more meaningful. This is the biggest challenge and at the same time, if done well, could create huge, positive shifts that will respond to consumer expectations and needs.”

Yet, in the aftermath of COVID-induced digitization, while concerns are still high, consumers are showing signs of being won over.

On the other side, when it comes to brand safety, there are plenty of other considerations to make.

31% of consumers say ads next to inappropriate content would impact their view of a brand.

This is twice as likely to negatively impact a brand than if it doesn’t promote diversity (15%). 

2020 saw much soul-searching in the ad industry, initially about striking the right tone around COVID-19, and then being critical about issues of diversity and representation. And while these issues are important, advertisers should be aware that the context around an ad can be just as damaging as what’s in the creative. 

Often the ad placement is just as, if not more important than, the content of the ad itself. 

All in all, from brand safety to consumer attention, the effectiveness of online ads is continuously evolving with consumer expectations, especially in the wake of COVID-19 digitization.

Yet, as these ads move in one direction, marketers shouldn’t overlook the potential of tried-and-tested traditional advertising – most notably TV.

How consumers feel about ads is paramount, because it directly affects their behavior, and that’s what brands have set out to influence in the first place.

Check our our entertainment trends report

Getting segmentation right: understanding diversity in LGBTQ+ audiences

Driven in particular by the Black Lives Matter movement, many brands are paying more attention to truly understanding the self-defined ethnicity and racial identity of their audience. 

Our GWI USA data shows the potentially multi-layered nature of identity. It reveals, for example, that among Americans who identify as Hispanic, about 1 in 10 also identify as Black/African-American, while about 1 in 20 also identify as Asian American. 

This overlap between race and ethnicity highlights the unique cultural connections that exist – and the inaccuracies that arise when these groups are segmented too bluntly. 

Grasping the intersectionality of your audiences

Following LGBT+ History month in the UK, I want to focus on an area that concerns me personally, and has arguably received less focus: understanding sexual orientation and gender identity. 

Yes, great strides have been made in terms of LGBTQ+ representation and prominence. We’re seeing growing diversity in ad campaigns along with a sense that brands are striving to represent a range of relationships and living situations.

This is positive and commendable – but are some brands running the risk of lumping an incredibly diverse group together and running on assumptions? 

Put more simply, is it right to treat the LGBTQ+ community as a homogeneous group? Does that not mask the rich diversity of this audience and effectively treat it as an “Other” group that contains any non-heterosexual individual? 

To answer this, we can look both at the definition itself, together with attitudinal and psychographic data.

The struggle to define a uniquely diverse audience 

The “LGBTQ+” label has become one of the most widely in recent years but there are multiple variations and extensions of it. One of the fuller versions is LGBTQIA, but even here there can be different definitions for different letters. Q can be “Queer” or “Questioning”. A can be “Asexual” or “Ally”. Its definitions and meanings are continuously evolving and can be interpreted differently by different people.

One reason for this is that it’s designed to be inclusive and, in particular, the presence of the “+” sign allows for individuals who don’t feel sufficiently represented by the existing letters to still feel a sense of belonging.

The flexibility and fluidity of the term is necessary and welcome. But when it comes to data analysis and campaign planning, should marketers be looking at this group as one entity? Is it right to assume that a community that includes a depth of situations spanning gender identity, sexual orientation and beyond would all act and think the same? 

For me, the answer is very clearly no.

I can think of few other groups where there is such immense diversity.

Where else we would find both men and women, as well as people who identify as neither; where we have people who are attracted to the same sex, to the opposite sex, to both sexes, or to neither; where we have people who feel their birth identity was right for them, as well as those who do not? And there are surely few other demographics-based audiences which could include people of any age, and in such a variety of life-stages/living circumstances.

The underlying challenge here is that by examining this group as whole – with all the richness and intersectionality of identity that lies therein – we risk treating anything that is not heterosexual as an “Other”. And it potentially quietens the very voices that marketers are trying to hear. 

Could a gay man have different attitudes, needs and circumstances to an asexual woman? Highly possible. Might a gay woman feel different levels of resonance to a marketing message compared to a transgender woman? At least at times, very likely. Could the rich intersectionality present among these audiences be lost if there’s just an “LGBTQ+” break added to the end of any analysis? Most definitely.

How audience data is changing to fit

Let’s look at data from GWI USA. We offer eight different answers across our sexual orientation question, and nine within our gender identity question. We hope it allows respondents to self-define themselves exactly as they would want to (or not at all: hence a “prefer not to say” option in both questions).

Certainly, there are areas where members of the LGBTQ+ community do stand apart. 

All groups are considerably less likely than heterosexual men and women to say that they believe in traditions, for example. Conversely, LGBTQ+ individuals are significantly more likely to feel that traditional gender-based roles are out-dated, or to over-index for wanting to feel accepted by others.

Given that these themes typically have some form of connection to personal identity, a degree of consensus within the LGBTQ+ community might be expected. But even here, the strength of the sentiment can vary conspicuously – and that’s a key learning in itself. LGBTQ+ individuals might be more likely than others to agree with such statements, but the levels of sentiment show a substantial range. Just 3 in 10 gay Americans say they believe in traditions, for example, but this dips to 2 in 10 among pansexual Americans and falls as low as 1 in 20 among asexual Americans. 

If we take this one step further, we can see how hunches or assumptions begin to get challenged. For example, while it’s true that members of the LGBTQ+ community are more likely than heterosexual men and women to describe their political views as liberal, it’s still 10% of gay women and men classify their views as conservative (half of whom say their views are very conservative). 

Equally, while groups within the LGBT+ community are considerably more likely than heterosexual men and women to think that terms such as “open-minded” and “tolerant” describe them, it still leaves significant segments within these groups who do not identify closely with these labels. 4 in 10 gender-fluid or non-binary individuals do not think of themselves as being particularly open-minded; 6 in 10 people who identify as asexual do not consider themselves as particularly tolerant. 

Tracking diversity within the LGBTQ+ audiences

Within the LGBTQ+ community – as in any other audience – a range of factors can drive different beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors: parental status, age, religion, urban vs rural location, and so on. 

As an example, the numbers within the LGBT+ community who say they are parents range considerably: from 10% and 15% among gender fluid individuals and gay Americans respectively; up to 25% among those who are unsure or curious; and climbing still higher to 40% among bisexual Americans. But even within this, other factors then exert a very strong influence.

While just 15% of bisexual Americans in Gen Z have a child, that jumps to 40% among bisexuals who are millennials, and then more than 60% within the Gen X and boomer audiences. 

It’s easy to see how just profiling “LGBTQ+ Americans” – or even going one step further and looking at “Bisexual Americans” – would potentially mask the richness of situations within these audiences. And for some, their identity as a parent could be just as, if not more, important to them than their orientation or gender.

In many cases, we need to recognize that gender identity or sexual orientation are important parts of what make up someone’s identity, not necessarily the predominant or overwhelming factors. Treating the LGBTQ+ audience as a homogeneous group already starts to mask this, but that’s accentuated still more if we fail to overlay other factors (demographic or otherwise).

For marketers, the message here is clear: where the data allows you to go deeper and to segment within the LGBTQ+ community, it’s an essential step in the process. Not only do we need to understand each group within it, but within these groups we also need to recognize the other parts of their lives that influence their attitudes and behaviors. 

Assuming that all individuals within it are like-minded or in similar situations might not give you the robust or nuanced insights you’re looking for – no matter how worthy the intention. 

Representing diversity first means understanding it better.

New call-to-action

Targeting gaming audiences: has the pandemic made it easier?

To call 2020 a “big year for gaming” is something of an understatement.

Two next-generation devices kicked off a console war and gaming on any device climbed to 87% worldwide – all of this, amid a global pandemic.

As a result, historic qualities of the industry began to change too – gaming is now more gender-balanced, and popular, than it’s ever been before.

But misconceptions continue to persist about the opportunities associated with it. 

Using our latest data set, GWI Gaming – and supporting data from our Core survey – we set out to tackle these misconceptions head on, answering key questions about the modern gaming landscape:

  • Has the pandemic changed motivations behind gaming?
  • What should brands bear in mind when entering this space?
  • Are gaming habits going to stick?

Gamer audiences are varied and require understanding.

While the gaming surge has presented new opportunities for brands, targeting gamers has never been more challenging. 

Gaming brands with a historic understanding of the landscape will be forced to re-approach these audiences with more precision, but for those unfamiliar with gaming – the non-endemics sizing up this space – it’s a necessity.

In the past, we’ve been clear to point out that “gamer” isn’t a term befitting everyone who picks up a controller; just as you wouldn’t define social media users or film-watchers in the same way.

Gaming boomed amid the pandemic, and it’s easy to think its identity has changed too – but our data suggests this isn’t necessarily the case.

Custom research from October last year revealed 30% of UK and U.S. internet users said they were playing more games since the pandemic began.

In contrast, just 2% said they’d just begun playing video games, suggesting the ‘boom’ came from those already gaming to begin with.

As such, these behavioral changes shouldn’t mistakenly be labeled as attitudinal; just because there are more people playing games, it doesn’t mean gaming has lost its cultural identity.

It’s still a highly tribal landscape, built up of distinct gamer subgroups.

Chart: gamers vary greatly

We can assume the pandemic has emphasized the overarching reasons people game; to have fun, relax or pass the time.

While universal, these motivations are surface deep. To understand how gamer mindsets vary, it’s crucial to observe their relationship with the activity, as opposed to their demographic.

Casual gamers – those with little to no interest in gaming and play once a week at most – are most likely to cite having run, relaxing and passing the time.

Hardcore gamers – those extremely interested in gaming and play every day – have more specific motivations for playing games. Unlike their casual counterpoints, they’re typically more likely to cite socializing, competing, and even developing new skills.

Treating gamers all in the same way ignores vital touchpoints that brands can tap into.

It’s worth remembering that, even among those playing the same device, genre and franchise, the style of gaming is dictated by the individual.

The way gaming audiences play and what they do during the game is telling.

Take Mario as an example. Some gamers attract millions of viewers online as they speedrun decades-old games in the series, while diehard prestige-hunters push themselves to collect every star in the Mushroom Kingdom.

Others just want to defeat Bowser in their own time. 

The pandemic may have expanded the ranks of gamers, but it did nothing to shake up the already present subcultures in gaming – arguably making them more important as isolated internet users sought entertainment and community elsewhere. 

Those weighing up the opportunities in gaming will need to carefully observe communities they can align with first, otherwise brand reputation could be put at risk.

Caution and authenticity are vital to brands entering gaming.

Gaming has proven itself an accommodating space for brands, ranging from the bold – and bizarre – such as KFC’s foray into PC gaming, to serious political messaging the Biden campaign plastered across homes in Animal Crossing.

Such success stories are enticing examples of how to enter the gaming space with carefully tuned messaging.

You need only look at where others have failed to see the ramifications, however; the less said about the U.S. Army’s presence on Twitch, the better.

We know that brands need to understand the motivations behind gaming if they want to target these individuals better, and a look at their interactions on social media reveals this in more detail.

Chart: gamers are community minded and vocal

Gamers like to talk. Online, or in-person, they’re quick to recommend games to one another or follow gaming-related content online. 

Social media is, of course, the primary culprit here, but our data highlights friends, entertainment sites and even gaming magazines as other prominent news sources – particularly among committed gamers.

The key takeaway here is that gamers, being a largely tribal audience, will inevitably share their opinions (or form them) elsewhere.

As people’s interest in, or engagement with, gaming grows, so too does the likelihood of them performing any of these activities we track. Brands need to prepare strategies carefully if they’re to avoid backlash down the line.

Gamers’ vocality can also be an advantage, however.

Our data shows 1 in 5 gamers, on any device, want brands to run their own customer communities or forums – rising to over 1 in 4 among hardcore audiences. 

By reaching out to gamers in their comfort zone, brands are setting themselves up to make more genuinely informed decisions down the line – a notable example observed in Gen.G’s partnership with Bumble that spawned its first all-female Fortnite team.

Gaming’s here to stay.

As gaming boomed, questions were raised about its sustainability; would other priorities take precedence when lockdowns ended?

It’s unlikely, for two reasons. One is that the gaming boom predates the pandemic, drawing in more “atypical” demographics (female and/or older) in the process.

Another is that, even within lockdowns, 35% of those who say they were spending more time on video games expected to continue that behavior post-outbreak. 

It’s better to look at it as a steady climb, not a sudden spike in response to the pandemic.

Now, with increases in gaming observed across all demographics, over 1 in 3 internet users in 15 markets play games every day, on any device.

Chart: gaming has become routine for many

Looking closer, males only lead against females by just three-percentage points, while Gen Zs or millennials are separated from their older counterparts by five.

Even parents of 3 or more children are finding the time to play games every single day, despite commitments elsewhere.

While gaming is still more prevalent among its traditional participants, it’s cemented itself as a routine activity for a range of audiences. 

There are, however, signs that the pandemic’s gaming surge will see a short-term dip post-COVID, as an interest in gaming fell three-percentage points among gamers, on any device, between Q3 and Q4 2020.

As activities outside of gaming open up, gamers, regardless of how often they play, will be keen to get back out there.

Things like going to the gym, attending music concerts, and seeing friends are already top priorities in the future, meaning gaming – even among its most devoted fans – is going to take a hit.

But brands need to remember that routines forged during lockdowns will be hard to break; engagement remains high and interest will likely rebound when other priorities have been settled. Not to mention the sunk costs involved in buying new devices and software.

At the same time, promising signs of gaming starting to stick among older generations signals new opportunities in the long-term.

Cheat codes: reaching gamers

No-one ever completed Dark Souls by button-mashing their way through to the end; caution is key. Likewise, when you’re gearing up to take on gaming audiences, it’s best to remember the following:

  • Motivations for gaming are more telling than demographics. Gamers are difficult to target by age or gender alone, even more so now. Brands studying the motivations behind gaming will find it easier to tap into different communities at the heart of the activity, helping them make informed decisions about how to approach them.
  • Gaming audiences require a nuanced approach. Gaming’s popularity has spawned partnerships in some of the most unlikely places, but this is the result of careful planning. Brands need to find out where they align best, exploring gaming communities and online-interactions in more detail.
  • Newcomers are everywhere, and here to stay. While we’ve seen a rise in female and older gamers since the pandemic began, this was already well under way. Newcomers have forged habits that won’t budge easily in the future. It’s time to ditch outdated gamer segmentations and prepare for growth across different devices, franchises and genres instead.
  • Interest will decline, engagement less so. There are already rumblings of gaming interest beginning to fall, as other priorities begin to take hold. However, with engagement remaining high, brands can’t label this as a one-off spawned by a global pandemic; interest is anticipated to rebound as people adapt to normality once again.
access our gaming report

How the new breed of investor is disrupting the financial markets

A swathe of new retail investors has flooded the financial stock markets over the last year.

Armed with lots of time on their hands, access to free trading apps, and online message boards, these so-called Reddit vigilantes temporarily turned Wall Street on its head. 

The GameStop saga was just one incident (perhaps the first of many), but it marked an important milestone.

For the first time in history, collective action on Reddit caused the price of a struggling video game retailer to shoot up, forcing institutional investors who were betting against it to repurchase the stock, thus driving the price even higher. 

Who would’ve thought that a bunch of supposedly inexperienced new investors were suddenly capable of influencing a market dominated by multibillion-dollar hedge funds? 

If they’re capable of doing this, it’s worth digging deeper into their behaviors as investors, the unique stamp they’re starting to leave on financial markets, and why they’re an important demographic for brands. 

Democratizing finance paved the way for new market entrants. 

Investing today is just a few clicks away online. It’s become as frictionless and simple as online shopping or scrolling through social media. 

Just a brief glance at Robinhood or Etoro and you’d see platforms that very much resemble social networks. 

Features like copy-trading – which allows you to mirror the trades of more experienced investors – and the ability to buy just fractions of trades have turned investing into just another lockdown pastime. 

Technological advancements coupled with pandemic-induced market volatility created the perfect conditions for digitally-savvy investors to enter the stock market in full swing.

chart showing 2020 saw an influx of young investors

In the UK and U.S., the share of Gen Z and millennials who own investments has grown by 20% and 16%, respectively, in the space of a year. 

In fact, millennials have now caught up with Gen X and, at the rate they’re going, we expect them to surpass their parents, and perhaps even their grandparents soon.  

We can finally bury the stereotype that millennials lack financial literacy or security and begin to see them for what they really are – committed investors. 

What matters here isn’t the fact that a few novice investors got lucky off a short squeeze though – that’s just why they got noticed. 

It’s that the largest generation in the U.S. and soon-to-be the largest in the UK is entering the financial markets for the first time ever; and they’re doing it in style. 

As we’re about to see, these young investors aren’t really copying their parents, and this will inevitably have broad implications for the wealth industry. 

High risk tolerance doesn’t mean recklessness. 

We come full circle since the pandemic-induced crash back in March and new investors show no signs of slowing down. In fact, they keep expanding their share of the market with more enthusiasm than ever.  

Around 3 in 10 of those investing over the past year in the UK and U.S. started doing so in 2021. 

The narrative suddenly turned from portraying young adults as having no assets and no wealth to inexperienced, risk-prone kids fueling a market bubble. 

And although they naturally lack the experience of their parents and grandparents who have been investing for decades, young investors aren’t necessarily reckless investors. 

In fact, our data shows they’re very quick to adopt what are considered ‘good‘ investing habits once they’ve been in the game for some time. 

This is evident when we compare the attitudes of the newbie young investors to their slightly more seasoned counterparts.

Chart showing not all young investors are the same

Gen Z and millennials who have been investing at least since last year are much more likely to have a long-term investing mentality, to have a financial adviser, as well as a strategy they adhere to. 

They may be young and more prone to choosing high risk investments, but they’re not as irresponsible as you’d think. 

Contrary to common beliefs that they’re scrolling through social media for investment advice, it’s actually finance and investment websites that are their go-to for investment information (42% use them). 

They’re certainly not kids either, given 35% are decision-makers in the workplace and a third are parents. 

So, although young investors may be attracted to the market due to hype and FOMO at first, they’re quick to realize investing isn’t just a short-term game; and this shines through when we look at what they base their investment decisions on as well.  

They are driving the CSR revolution.

Across a wide range of today’s issues – from gender equality and human rights, to the future of the environment and sustainability – younger groups express more strident views than their older counterparts. 

Our custom coronavirus research revealed Gen Z and millennials are the most likely to believe companies behaving sustainably and individuals reducing their personal carbon footprint had become more important to them since the pandemic.

Six months later, our Zeitgeist research confirmed this sentiment with 7 in 10 of this group saying big corporations should be doing more to address environmental issues. 

And although stated values and beliefs don’t always translate into actions, we’ve seen they do make a difference when it comes to young adults’ investment decisions. 

Chart showing adults invest in changing the world

Compared to Gen X and boomers, young investors are much more likely to take into account a company’s CSR and environmental policies when making an investment decision. 

This isn’t to say that young investors don’t consider the hard numbers like past stock performance or companies’ balance sheets (4 in 10 do). It just means they’re more likely than their older counterparts to invest in a company’s long-term vision for the future than in the “here and now”.

Yes, these young investors might not have the same purchasing power and influence on the stock market just yet, but we shouldn’t underestimate the intergenerational wealth transfer that’s taking place. It’s estimated at over $30 trillion in North America alone. 

And with a third round of COVID-19 stimulus checks expected to come in March, many are already planning their investments.  

The stake millennial investors have in companies won’t just be from a shareholder point of view though.

As this group is entering their peak earning years, they’re also representing a greater portion of decision-makers in the workplace.

This means their influence over business decisions will increasingly come from both being leaders in the workplace, as well as shareholders with a degree of influence over corporate governance. 

They’re pushing crypto to the mainstream.

2020 saw digital currencies explode in popularity, with the recent investment by Tesla into bitcoin capping it off. 

To put this into perspective, in 2019 11% of U.S. and UK online investors owned cryptocurrency, and this was the least prominent investment held at the time. 

By comparison, in the past year alone 18% have purchased cryptocurrency, making it the third most commonly purchased investment, just after stocks (55%) and mutual funds (31%). 

But the question remains, how much of this has been driven by young retail investors.

The answer is, a fair amount: 

Two thirds of those that have invested in crypto in the past year are Gen Z or millennials. 

And although there’s talk of this group’s love for crypto stemming from the fact they expect a short-term gain, their profile as investors show otherwise. 

Crypto investors are actually 26% more likely than the average investor to invest with a strategy in mind. 

Digital currencies are decentralized assets so they’re more likely to pull through sharp downturns in financial markets that may occur in the future. 

As one of the few assets that’s thought to be immune to inflation, which is likely around the corner, they may well be young adults’ long-term safe-haven assets. 

Either way this new breed of investors is here to stay and the impact they’ll have on the financial markets will be profound. 

From driving the sustainability agenda, to believing in disruption and digital money, they invest with a new mentality that’s driving change in the world. 

Why brands should pay attention to them

Compared to the average internet user their age millennial investors hold enormous purchasing power.

The vast majority of them occupy the first (54%) or the second (20%) quantile of our purchasing power segmentation¹, meaning they represent a key target demographic for brands in the post-COVID recovery stage.

With life largely being in a limbo over the past year, a large proportion of their savings and investments have not yet been utilized.

Our data shows that UK and U.S. millennial investors are more likely than the average investor to purchase 44 of the 48 products we ask about in the next 3-6 months ­– a testament that revenge spending is on the cards.

This pent-up demand is great news for discretionary brands in the travel and luxury sectors that were hard hit by the crisis.

We’re already seeing high-end luxury brand LMVH emerging from the pandemic stronger than ever, while at the same time preparing for further expansion in its ecommerce and direct-to-consumer businesses through strategic acquisitions.

Similarly, in the travel industry, Airbnb is “laser-focused on preparing for the travel rebound”.

Whether through day-to-day spending, or via more long-term, high-ticket purchases, the new breed of investors will be key in bouncing the economy back in 2021.

Click to access our connecting the dots 2021 report

¹The quantiles are calculated by combining GWI Core Household Income data, taken from the individual country household income questions, with International Dollar Purchasing Power Parity, or Global Dollar Value, data taken from the IMF. This allows us to assign each income bracket with a value in dollars so that the value represented by each income bracket is comparable across each market.

How the right sports data helps you sell to fans

sports data: foam hand

Sports enthusiasts aren’t standing still.

Like all consumers today – they’re adjusting to lifestyle changes, they’re active across an ever-growing spread of media and they’re forging new communities of like-minded people.

But what separates sports enthusiasts from everyone else? What makes the sports industry kind of unique? The answer: fandom.

Having an enthused, dedicated group of followers (often from birth) who track their teams online, watch games, check results under the dinner table, then head to social media to get the latest controversy is a gift – this is every brand’s dream.

But ‘fan’ and ‘customer’ don’t mean the same thing.

And sports brands can’t survive on selling ad space alone, they need fans to convert.

Get to know your fanbase from a personal perspective, then understand what drives them to purchase. Here’s how it’s done.

What good sports data looks like

Major teams and leagues have communities of fans scattered across the globe. 

Kyle Bunch, VP and Managing Director at Global Sports Venture Studio, explains the importance of getting to know your fan groups

“Those who can use data to build direct relationships – and with it, leverage them to maximise revenue per fan – will thrive.”

Take Real Madrid, for example. Its fanbase is said to be around 250 million.

Spain’s population is around 47 million according to the World Bank, meaning the vast majority of its fans are overseas.

So it’s a job to keep track of each fan group. Top drawer sports data helps you fill in the blanks, but there are a few key elements too look out for:

 

  • For any international business, a multi-market view of your audience is a must – and if you’re aiming to capture their hearts, then knowing each pocket of fans at a local level helps.

 

  • Complete harmonization means data gathered across regions is collected using the same methodology, so you can cross-compare each group in one platform with ease.

 

  • And for your cross-comparison to be effective, you’ll want detail. When you have thousands of data points at your fingertips, you’ll build accurate personas across regions from segments that make sense. 

 

  • The final piece of the sports data puzzle is speed. Adjusting to shifts is part and parcel of staying relevant. Find a data source that will give you quick answers when you need them most.

The kinds of insights you should be looking for

If you’ve got an engaged fan base, perhaps spanning multiple regions, you’ll know how valuable that addressable market is.

If we’re talking in marketing and sales terminology, half the customer journey is ticked off. You’ve got them through the door, enjoying the content, and integrated into the community, now’s the time to drive sales – whether it’s merchandise, subscriptions, tickets, you name it.

But there’s no merit to pushing unsolicited ads and products on your fans – it’ll only serve to push them away. With rich sports data you’ll be able to serve them things they really want, delivered in a way they’re expecting, with a message that’s exciting.

Below are three areas to focus on, along with some example questions you should be asking:

 

1. Brand advocacy

Knowing what attracts your fans to your brand and others they normally buy from steers you towards the right kind of product strategy and marketing messaging.

  • Are they more likely to talk to friends and family about a brand or product if it’s associated with their favorite sports league or team?
  • What other brand attributes do they like? Reliability? Sustainability? Humour?

 

2. Purchase drivers

It helps to think of purchase drivers as the final push. You’ve done too much good work to get the fans to this stage of the funnel for them to turn back now. 

Study which factors turn in ‘nah maybe later’ into a ‘hell yeah, let’s do it’. 

  • Are they more likely to purchase a product from a brand that’s associated with their favourite team?
  • Will they be more likely to buy if there are rewards, free shipping or discount coupons etc?

 

3. Advertising preferences

You’ll want to know the kinds of advertising and formats your fans respond best to, as well as the ones they find most intrusive:

  • Is it video, blogs, memes or all the above that they want most? What kinds of ads make them sit up and listen?
  • What kinds of messages make them tick? Funny? Informative? Straight-talking?
  • Do any types of advertising or sponsorship annoy them?


A good quality sports data set allows you to combine attributes.

For example, fans who (1) follow teams/leagues/brands on social media can be layered over (2) those likely to buy a product from their favorite team. This gives you an idea of those most likely to buy from a sports brand they love. Factor in their advertising preferences and you have the bones of an ad campaign. 

This is a simple example – in reality, you’ll want to segment your audience using dozens of attributes, and build out full audience personas from there.

Building personas that are actually human

To drive sales from your fans, you’ve got to know the person behind the giant foam hand – now more than ever.

Outlooks, perceptions, self-perceptions and attitudes all play a part in how they discover, research and interact with sports brands. Couple that with the usual regional differences and you’ve got all the reasons you need to get to know your fans in the most personal way you can.

Good sports data lets you look beyond fandom.

It reveals the emotional, human elements that take your fan persona off the page and bring it to life.

Here’s a sample of the kinds of things you should really understand.

 

1. Lifestyles

Fans will fall into multiple lifestyle categories – perhaps more so than other audiences because they’re spread across all genders, age categories, and financial band brackets. Regardless, it’s useful to pool your consumers based on common attributes, so you can tailor a strategy to each segment.

  • Which economic bracket do they fall into?
  • Do they have disposable cash?
  • What is most important to them? Family? Work? Community? Social status?

 

2. Attitudes and values

How they behave commercially has a great deal to do with attitudes and, while it shapes lifestyle choices, the focus here is squarely on psychographics. Buying stuff is an emotional process, so when you see the world through your fans eyes, it’ll become a whole lot easier to shape the perfect message.

  • Do they seek value over luxury?
  • What do they want to achieve by buying products? Social reformation? An easier life?  
  • Do they want to stand out from the crowd?

 

3. Perceptions 

Attitudinal data covers how they see the world, but perceptions give brands a window into how they see themselves. 

  • How would they describe themselves? A risk-taker? Confident? Decisive? 
  • What’s their outlook? Are they ambitious? Perhaps they’re pessimistic.
  • How does their perception of the sports industry differ from others?

A lot goes into understanding your fans, but guided by the right data, it gets a lot easier. 

By all means sell to your fans, but do your research first

Many brands would love to have the dedicated audience that many sports leagues and teams have.

But that doesn’t mean their fans are hovering over the ‘buy now’ button as we speak. 

Fandom isn’t just respect for a brand – it’s more emotional than that. 

And it shouldn’t be taken for granted. Serving generic, overly commercialized marketing campaigns selling products they don’t need is likely to have a negative impact.

Our newest data set, GWI Sports is coming soon – built to give you answers on all the above, along, with the speed, accuracy and depth you need to bring your fans into focus across markets.

sports data: woman holding basketball

Dating in 2021: swiping left on COVID-19

The pandemic may have ruled out long walks on the beach or impromptu coffee dates, but Bumble’s recent IPO success story shows online dating is still going strong; an industry reportedly racing its way to a $3.5 billion valuation by 2025.

In times of social isolation, online dating has endured as a means for internet users to interact on more than just a romantic level. But the next few months will throw up particular challenges and opportunities alike. Using data from a Zeitgeist survey fielded in January, we look to answer the following questions:

  • What does the global online dating landscape look like today?
  • Has the pandemic affected enthusiasm for online dating?
  • What matters most to would-be daters when using these services?

Online dating is going steady

Global figures for using online dating services have remained pretty consistent since 2017. Even in Europe and North America, where significant lifestyle changes forced countless industries to reshuffle and adapt, online dating has endured.

As of Q4 2020, 39% of single, divorced or widowed users say they used an online dating service in the last month.

chart showing global online dating landscape

A break from traditional dating amid the pandemic has emphasized the practicality of online services. But niche services have played their part too, catering to audiences outside the usual user base.

Among older users, a digital leap is changing the dating landscape quicker than ever before.

Like social media, dating apps have never strictly been reserved for younger audiences, but the evolution we recently saw on social is happening in this space too. Older users have been adopting digital services at unprecedented speeds, and dating is no exception. 

The pandemic is set to make a further impact on who joins the dating scene. In the U.S., for example, 37% of Gen Z and millennials, who are single, expect to start dating in the next six months. This is an 11% decrease since Q2 2020, with closed campuses and workplaces the likely culprit here. On the flipside, the number of single baby boomers expecting to start dating has increased 18%. 

There’s a considerable opportunity here for dating platforms, even with the dating intentions of their typical user base having been delayed. Older users have taken priority in most vaccination rollouts across the globe, so they will be able to go on in-person dates sooner as well. 

Platforms will need to consider how these older audiences shape their strategies as normality begins to pick up again. While it’s never too late to get into dating, some concerns about taking this activity online will endure.

New users, old hurdles

Concerns about privacy and online safety are a mainstay of all internet users, but among Gen X and boomer singles, 41% worry about the use of their personal data by companies – a nine-percentage point lead over their Gen Z and millennial counterparts. 

This translates clearly into their online dating motivations. Knowing other users are vetted thoroughly, for example, outranks any other reason to use dating services – on par with younger audiences at 22%. 

Much of the discussion about dating during the pandemic has been around how to recreate activities virtually. But platforms can’t overlook the privacy and security fundamentals when doing this.

It’s also worth noting that online dating has always been more popular among LGBTQ+ audiences since we began tracking this datapoint.

As of Q4 2020, 37% of single, LGBTQ+ internet users used an online dating app in the last month. 

Again, while younger users dominate the activity, LGBTQ+ Gen X and boomers make for keen online daters, with 34% having used such platforms in the last month – a 16-percentage-point lead over their heterosexual counterparts. 

The same standards of online safety need to be maintained, particularly when they have such importance to vulnerable or minority audiences.

Internet users are socially distanced, but still have love on their minds.

Despite consistent use of online dating throughout the pandemic, enthusiasm for it has taken a hit. 

chart showing the role of the pandemic in online dating

In the U.S. and UK, 46% of singles are uninterested in online dating at this time, leading against those who are interested by 16-percentage-points. 

While this might seem disheartening, these figures shouldn’t be taken as an indication that online dating is in decline, but that people have other priorities right now – nor is dating immune from Zoom fatigue.

When we look ahead to a reduction in social distancing rules, and a reopening of public spaces/hospitality venues, this low interest in online dating could quickly translate into renewed enthusiasm. Travel companies have already seen a surge in bookings, and it won’t be long before the hospitality sector begins taking names too.

In fact, 25% of UK and U.S. singletons, who haven’t used an online dating service say they are interested in trying online dating (rising to 50% for those who have). As normality resumes, and more viable dating spots return, a venture into online dating shouldn’t be ruled out – particularly with our data signalling interest in dating six months down the line.

For some, it’s about more than romance.

There’s potential in virtual companionship through dating platforms.

Shar Dubey, CEO of Match Group, commented in a recent earnings call on the opportunities of online dating for combating loneliness in general;

“Real life connections are decreasing and loneliness is on the rise around the world…there are benefits to having deeper connections and conversations with people online”

Match’s recent $1.7 billion acquisition of Hyperconnect brings the friendship apps Hakuna and Azar under the Match umbrella, confirming an intent to double down on relationships outside of romantic pairings.

After a long period of social isolation, services that accomodate friendly interaction offer a platform for these newcomers to dip their toe in the dating scene once again – or, indeed, for the first time. 

Online daters think safety-first

During the pandemic, virtual interactions have become the mainstay of events, socializing, working and schooling. For online dating, this was already a cornerstone – daters met, vetted and interacted online, before embarking on a date in the real world.

While brands have been working with virtual tools to entice online dating for some time, our data suggests the key hurdles to the activity still concern personal privacy and safety online. Bumble, for example, grants female users the ability to make first contact – a USP that effectively made the platform a safer space for this group.

Given also the impact of a surge in interest among older audiences, these matters of safety will become more of a concern. Brands need to think twice before they develop strategies aimed solely at younger internet users.

chart showing how saftey, privacy and personal preference are still key

Among all UK and U.S. singletons, just 13% say online games or activities would motivate them to use online dating more. 

This doesn’t rule out online activities entirely – Gen Z and millennial singles are 44% more likely to cite them as an important factor for a dating service. As the core users of online dating, brands considering these strategies can score an easy win here. Down the line, when public spaces become more widely available, suggesting places for dates can then become more commonplace.

Of course, matching users based on preference should be a priority for all online dating platforms; it’s the most popular motivation for online dating across all age groups, genders, and sexual orientations. 

UK respondents differ in this respect, with just 16% citing more personalized matches compared to 21% who say users should be vetted more thoroughly. It’s a possibility that, at this time, a lack of physical confirmation means users want to know the person they’re interacting with is genuine. 

This is by no means less important in the U.S. – 22% still say vetting is important – but it falls behind the requirements of personalized matchups, more choice in the area, and attitudes to COVID-19 and social distancing.

It’s not just online safety that brands need to take into account – over 3 in 4 U.S. internet users are concerned about the current coronavirus situation in their country. Residents may be able to meet their matches face-to-face – which explains why vetting is less of a priority – but they want to know their physical health isn’t at risk when they do.

This also may explain a higher expectation for dating apps to give users more choice in their local area. Convenience aside, the bigger wish for this in the UK can likely be put down to lockdown measures restricting the number of potential matches, while U.S. users are similarly motivated by their attitudes towards COVID in general.

It’s important to remember that these concerns for safety have been around before the pandemic and will continue long after.

Bringing it all together

Online dating and social media have been lifelines for many at this time. As the two merge closer together, and social distancing becomes a distant memory, brands plotting the future digital companionship landscape will need to remember the following:

  • Online dating is growing more diverse In line with their increasingly digital behaviors, older users are growing more active on, and interested in, online dating. Having adopted digital-first mindsets throughout the pandemic, these users are eager to find love in new ways.
  • Interest, post-COVID, will rebound Use of online dating has endured, but the real growth is yet to come. As dating hotspots open their doors once more, meetups will be the first priority, giving opportunity for brands to promote businesses and activities for couples.
  • Companionship, of any kind, is important now For some, finding love is secondary to finding friendship. For others, online dating is new territory they need to ease into. 
  • Safety concerns aren’t budging Dating platforms will be held to the same safety standards  as regular social media services. There’s no room for tradeoff here, particularly as newcomers will want assurance their romantic lives are safeguarded.
Click to access our connecting the dots 2021 report

Greece: Zeroing in on our newest market

Greece has a vibrant history dating back more than two and a half thousand years. 

Now, the country’s past intersects with the present – shaping the way modern Greek consumers think and feel.

We’ve cut through the noise and pieced together how they stand apart from the global average.

Still recovering from an economic crisis, they’re slower to adopt new technology – both because of its financial cost, and because they tend to have less trust in institutions and big data.

But while Greece lags behind in tech adoption, its consumers have other priorities.

They’re fast emerging as some of the most community-minded and inquisitive individuals on the planet. They’re passionate about social issues and they dream of traveling the globe.

For brands looking to zero in on this audience, it’s pivotal they get to know the full story.

1. They’re culture enthusiasts. 

Greeks are passionate about their country’s long and rich history, and this is indicative of how they like to spend their free time.

They’re 43% more likely than the average global consumer to be arts and culture enthusiasts¹.

As the birthplace of theater, it’s perhaps unsurprising that at 48%, Greeks are more interested in it than any of our other 46 surveyed countries.

But their cultural interests are broad – they love books, museums, and fine arts too. 

And they also show a fondness for other more traditional forms of entertainment – they’re more than twice as likely to say their preferred way to listen to music is via the radio, or that they’re interested in playing board games.

In light of this, companies are adopting Greek culture as part of their identities.

Zeus+Dione is a fashion brand doing just that, describing itself as a “unique interpretation of myth and tradition”.

2. They’re community-minded.

In Greece, community spirit is all-important.

People in Greece are 22% more likely to say it’s important to contribute to their community. 

They’re passionate about looking after the environment too – 54% always try to recycle, which is considerably above the global average of just 39%.

Chart: community is everything in Greece

It’s likely that a combination of religious and cultural influences have helped shape these altruistic tendencies. 

The Orthodox Church is a strong influence and Greeks are 68% more likely than other Europeans to say their faith is important to them. 

They’re also considerably more likely to describe themselves as traditional, and while Greece’s population does skew older, this trend persists for its younger consumers as well.

Their online habits are also shaped by this community spirit. Consumers in Greece are more likely to discuss politics online, to use social media to support good causes, or to follow charities.

For brands this is key – good CSR in Greece goes a long way.

Consumers there are much more likely than the average consumer to want brands to support local suppliers, be eco-friendly, and be socially responsible.

One brand who’s tapped into this sentiment is Nescafé. The coffee brand launched a campaign in 2016 to provide unemployed young Greeks with professional training and job certifications.

As we’re about to see, Greece’s consumers are strong-willed when it comes to their finances. But brands should take every opportunity to help.

3. They’re smart spenders.

A combination of the Greek debt crisis and – more recently – the economic implications of COVID-19 have been devastating for the financial security of the country’s people. 

Compared to the rest of Europe, Greece has significantly higher unemployment levels and a below average home ownership rate.

But we can dive far deeper than these rigid metrics and truly discover how Greeks feel about their finances, and what it means for their purchasing habits. 

Consumers in Greece are 35% more likely than the global average to be good at managing their money – over half say that they are.

And this has a serious knock-on effect for when they interact with brands; they’re 54% more likely to say they spend time looking for the best deals.

They also show an above-average tendency to choose to buy cheaper own-brand products or discover brands through product trials or price comparison websites. 

But it’s perhaps online shopping where they’re the most financially savvy, being much more likely to make a purchase online if they’re able to get free delivery, loyalty points, or even an entry into a competition.

Ultimately, while consumers in Greece are ready to spend, they’re going to be smart doing it.

Chart: Ecommerce in Greece

Interestingly, nestled in among these financial incentives are calls for security when shopping online.

For many, the ability to pay with cash on delivery feels safer, for example. While guest check-out ensures they’re able to maintain their anonymity.

This likely lies with their deep-rooted concerns for new technology.

Download the Greece market snapshot, a quick view of the consumer stats to know.

4. They’re tech-skeptics.

Greece’s recent economic history has reduced trust in institutions. When combined with their fondness for tradition, the result is more apprehension around new technology.

Just 30% of consumers in Greece are confident using new technology, compared to 44% globally.

They show above-average concerns about how their data is used online, both by the government and by companies.

Feeling secure is crucial and many consumers in Greece are willing to forgo the benefits of new technology for this reason.

Brands need to take note of this tech skepticism. While digital offerings may be key to winning over consumers in other markets, in Greece it’s a different story.

This is evident by their device usage. While mobile has overtaken desktop as their most important device to access the internet, this difference is far less pronounced than in other parts of the world.

Even in Europe, which has been slower to adopt a mobile-first mindset, Greece is playing catch-up: 42% still say they prefer to use their desktop devices – which is significantly above the European average of 35%.

As a result, some mobile applications are yet to take off. For example, just 14% have used a mobile payment service in the last month – compared to a European average of 25%. 

Instead of new technology when looking for a new mobile phone – such as AR, biometrics, or 5G – they’re more likely to want improvements in what they already have, and that includes enhanced camera capabilities.

Although it was broadcast in the U.S., Apple’s “Take Mine” commercial perfectly reflects these consumers’ tech priorities, while showcasing other important aspects of their culture.

Tech-skeptics were won over by the phone’s then-new Portrait Mode. And since the ad also featured a grandmother and a priest, it also touched on the cultural aspects and sense of community that’s so important to consumers in the country. 

5. They’re global thinkers.

They know that the world is a big place and they’re ready to explore it.

Globally, 50% of consumers say they like to know what’s going on in the world – this rises to 71% in Greece.

Their interest in the world has materialized into a love for travel. An activity that around two-thirds are interested in, making it more popular there than in any other country we track.

Vacation planners are researching their summer trips right now.

And in Greece, where consumers are 46% more likely to use the internet to research new places and 40% more likely to follow travel writers and companies on social media, there’s plenty of opportunity to reach them.

This is especially noteworthy for domestic travel providers. Compared to the average consumer, those in Greece are 15% more likely to be planning a domestic vacation at the moment. 

We’re so excited to have added Greece to our core dataset. This is just a glimpse into the lives of its consumers, and we can’t wait to learn more.

Greek consumers in 2021: get the statistics to know

¹Defined as those who say they are interested in at least three of the following: books/literature, dance (ballet, street dance, salsa etc.), fine art, history, live events (e.g. music festivals), museums/galleries, theater, or urban/modern art.

Sustainability in 2021: business as usual isn’t an option

2021 so far has seen a string of green promises. 

President Joe Biden has suspended leases for fossil fuel development on federal lands.

In China, renewable energy made up the majority of the country’s total energy investment for the first time in 2020. And Bill Gates has set out an action plan to tackle climate change

Meanwhile, BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, will push companies to commit to achieving net zero emissions by 2050, and even hinted at dropping companies who fail to do so. 

What was once seen as a “nice-to-have” is now a necessity for both businesses and governments. It literally pays to be more sustainable.

Consumers want to play their part too, but it’s not without challenges.

Following on from last week’s theme of corporate governance and investing, we focus on the barriers to behaving more sustainably and the role businesses – particularly CPG and retail brands – play in making environmental ambitions a reality. 

Where there’s a will, there’s not always a way.

Before COVID-19 even entered our vocabulary, the climate crisis was a burning problem. 

Fast forward to today, and the situation is even more dire. In our Connecting the dots annual trends report, we explored the real impact of COVID-19 on the environment, and the actions needed to reset how we operate on an individual, corporate, and governmental level. 

Climate change, pollution, and the plastics crisis are the leading environmental worries for consumers in the U.S. and UK.

Over the past year, consumers said they’ve made an effort to recycle more, use less energy, and reduce food waste; all very practical, more easily implemented steps.

These actions came ahead of using fewer single-use plastics – likely due to hygiene and health reasons during the pandemic.

What’s left is a mountain of new waste. Face masks littering the streets are a common sight; and the disposal of millions of extra vaccination syringes only adds to the issue. 

Actions like buying more products with recyclable packaging or buying more organic food fall down the list of priorities for most consumers. But when it comes to organic food, Gen Z appear to be the exception – 27% say they’ve bought more organic food over the past year compared to 16% of boomers.

This could be because of the associated health benefits of eating organically, making them a more attractive market for organic food brands in particular.

These environmental actions don’t top the list because they’re less attainable. It’s crystal clear why when we look at the barriers to purchasing eco-friendly products. Yep, you guessed it: price. 

Chart: eco-friendly products aren't always a viable option

60% of consumers in the U.S. and UK say the high cost of eco-friendly products is a barrier to purchasing them. 

Cost is the biggest barrier by quite some distance, and remains the same across high and low-income groups.

From our GWI Core research, we know the majority of consumers would rather pay more for an eco-friendly product, which really highlights the massive gap between intent versus action. 

The cost barrier is a theme that’s come up before in our research, and the fact consumer sentiment hasn’t changed in a couple of years says a lot. Consumers could have the best intentions in the world, but unless eco-friendly products become more affordable, we all face a losing uphill battle. 

While cost is the biggest hurdle, it’s certainly not the only one.

Many consumers say they also have difficulty finding eco-friendly products or don’t have enough information about what eco-friendly really means.

This comes down to messaging and communications, and it’s something for sustainable brands to bear in mind. If consumers don’t understand the benefits, or believe in the mission, it’ll be a tricky feat to engage them in the first place.

More action is needed if we want to bridge the recycling gap.

We don’t see the same barriers when it comes to recycling or using reusable packaging, but there’s still noticeable hurdles to overcome.

Around 25% of consumers say they’re not sure which products are recyclable or not, and 15% say they’re not sure how to correctly sort through materials.

This signals a public education issue around recycling, and the need for more information – especially for young people, as our research shows. 

Chart: The recycling gap

Boomers are far more likely to cite no barriers to recycling, which isn’t surprising given this group is the most likely to say they always try to recycle compared to Gen Z and millennials

Across the board, younger generations are far more likely to say their individual impact doesn’t make a difference, or that certain activities like recycling or using reusable packaging take too much effort. 

Gen Z are 3 times as likely as boomers to say that it takes too much effort to recycle (22% vs 7%).

Gen Z are well-known to be very vocal about climate change and environmental issues, so this doesn’t necessarily mean they don’t care. But it does point to the different mindsets across generations. 

Perhaps Gen Z feel that their individual impact isn’t enough. And they’re right, to a degree. 

An individual choosing to recycle or to use less plastics alone isn’t enough. Action is needed from every part of society, particularly corporations.

Gen Z in particular need support to be able to achieve the world they so vocally push for. Messaging about the impact each person can make, and how this contributes to wider environmental goals, for example, could be a tangible way to reach them. 

Manufacturers also need to make recycling easier. Many materials can’t be recycled from home and have to be recycled at special recycling facilities – another barrier.

Let’s take Hovis bread recycling program as an example. Only a handful of locations in central London can recycle this packaging, so it’s not a viable option for many people; particularly those without access to a car, which is more likely for young people. 

Lasting change starts at the source.

2020, alongside 2016, was the joint hottest year on record ever.

It’s no wonder that the World Economic Forum Global Risks Report 2021 identifies climate action failure, extreme weather, and biodiversity loss, alongside infectious diseases, as the top global risks for the next ten years.

As grim at it sounds, it’s a much-needed message to spark change. In plain terms: what we’ve been doing isn’t enough, and there’s no time to tiptoe around. 

As a result, business actions are increasingly under the spotlight. Around 70% of consumers in the U.S./UK say corporations should do more to address environmental issues.

Chart: brand actions need to focus on packaging and affordability

The top actions consumers want brands to take are to create products with less packaging, or with recycled packaging, and offer more affordable eco-friendly alternatives. Ultimately, real change requires action at the source. 

Unless these sustainable options are implemented by manufacturers and brands, the choice to behave more sustainably will be a challenge for most consumers. 

Sustainable packaging solutions are arguably even more important now, as the rate of online shopping has increased. With more consumers planning to rely on ecommerce post-pandemic, there’s excess packaging and waste to deal with. 

More so than other generations, Gen Z want brands to be more transparent about their sustainability practices and donate to environmental groups.

They want brands to put their money where their mouth is and be clearer about what they’re actually doing. This group are astute and vocal – and they’ll increasingly demand more from brands.

Various CPG and retail brands have made steps in the right direction. Ocado Zoom is trialing several electric and pedal-powered vehicles to make deliveries from its site in London. It also recently launched a dedicated aisle for B-Corp brands. The decision was based around “making greener choices easier for consumers”, which comes back to our point – sustainability needs to be implemented at the source.

Nestle also has plans to use paper-based packaging for all its Smarties products. 

Meanwhile, big tech companies like Amazon, Facebook, Google, and Microsoft are all in a race to become the greenest.

These companies have become the world’s biggest corporate purchasers of clean energy. They’re all heavy users of electricity, but their influence to change the entire electricity system is huge, with significant implications for the planet. Not to mention that climate goals are big sources of rivalry between tech giants and other companies as well, highlighting how going green is a key competitive advantage. 

It’s too soon to say whether ambitious climate plans will be met. One thing’s for sure though: business as usual has to be a thing of the past.

If we put even a fraction of the collective effort that went into tackling COVID-19 to address climate change, the future will look much greener.

Click to access our connecting the dots 2021 report

What corporate governance can learn from the GameStop mania

“Never let a good crisis go to waste”. Like many tone-deaf phrases used during the pandemic, this one has reached ‘cliche’ status, peaking on Google Trends just as the outbreak took hold outside of China. 

Nonetheless, it does reflect how many people are in search of silver linings and new beginnings in anticipation of the world’s recovery. 

It’s an attitude which can be clearly observed in the stock markets, with younger generations representing the fastest growth segment among equity investors. Following the GameStop saga, we’re all aware of what many of these determined young investors are capable of. 

Harnessing that collective momentum for sustainability

They’re capable of much more than this though, because their values will increasingly shape the kind of pressure shareholders will be placing on public companies. 

Chief among these pressure-points will be sustainability. 

Goldman Sachs notes that in the energy sector alone, climate-related shareholder votes have doubled since 2011, and it was recently announced that BP has effectively thrown aside its oil exploration team as it positions itself for a greener future. 

Of course, not everyone – especially fledgling younger investors – can buy enough shares to qualify to vote at a company’s annual meeting, but they can choose where to invest their money. 

These choices will be a driving force in the growth of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) investment standards which are piling pressure on every industry.

Make no mistake, this kind of investment activism is already happening.

The recent short squeeze stocks like GameStop were powerful examples of how younger groups have the means to overcome their generational wealth disparity to project power through collective action.

These showed how, with the right communication and organization, retail investor communities with a cause can seriously rattle the hedge funds for the first time in history. 

Admittedly, these price swings were propelled by the institutional investors being forced to buy back their shorted stocks to avoid further losses, which drove the prices up to their heights.

Also, not every investor in these short squeeze stocks bought in for the cause, especially around the price peaks. But there is a precedent which has been set here. 

Conflicting views on climate change responsibility

Our data shows that sustainability is a core value for younger age groups who are now entering the stock market. Their approach to sustainability, however, is at odds with their older counterparts. 

The differences in these approaches say a lot about where these generations place the responsibility for climate change prevention. 

This, in turn, reveals how younger age groups will be pushing the sustainability agenda forward, and companies are directly in their crosshairs.

Broadly speaking, older generations have a much more hands-on approach to tackling climate change. They’re more likely than younger groups to be taking practical steps in their daily activities to reduce their own carbon footprint, such as recycling, using less energy, and using fewer single-use plastics. 

Younger consumers make a lot of noise about climate change, and their feelings on the subject are much more volatile. This is especially the case in Western countries like Europe and North America. 

It’s summed up in how they view the future of the environment: they’re much more likely than Gen X and boomers to either say the environment will get better or get worse in the future; a reflection of how these strong feelings are articulated between optimists and pessimists.

Older groups, on the other hand, are a lot more likely to believe there’ll be no change in the state of the environment in the future. That says a lot.

Although younger age groups do participate in practical actions like recycling, they’re relatively more inclined to believe individual action is futile without companies taking more responsibility.

Gen Z and millennials are up to twice as likely as older generations to believe their individual impact doesn’t make a difference when recycling and adopting reusable packaging.  

70% of them say brands should be doing more to address environmental issues. 

The most desired brand actions tend to focus on packaging, disposal, and affordability of eco-friendly products. But younger consumers stand out for putting a heavier emphasis on brands working with other stakeholders in society to drive more collective action. This could be actions like partnering with environmental groups or donating to them. 

This is a clear reminder that companies aligning themselves with expectations of sustainability need to think broader than their own operations. 

Whether it’s a customer or an investor, the future of these companies rests on demonstrating to them they’re pursuing a collective response, alongside tending to their own climate-related affairs. This stakeholder-driven perspective will be an important competitive differentiator.

The Tesla effect: sustainable innovation is sexy

We fully expect these consumer-centric expectations of brands to translate into investor-centric ones. 

This will open up a new front in sustainability to drive corporate action, and companies need to put their product innovation and strategies under the microscope to keep pace between these customer stakeholders and investor shareholders. 

The challenge is in how globally dispersed these groups tend to be for many public companies. So staying as close as possible to the attitudes and behaviors of these audiences, using globally consistent research for visibility across regions is key to success.

To see these consumer-centric expectations in action in the stock market, just look at Tesla. It took 18 years for the electric vehicle company to report a full-year profit. But that didn’t stop swathes of investors rallying to the stock and biting their tongues when, year-after-year, Elon Musk reinvested potential profits to fuel the company’s growth and innovation. 

That doesn’t make Tesla unique – growth stocks typically pump their earnings back into the business to sustain that growth. What does make Tesla unique in this respect is how many cars it produces compared to other auto manufacturers, and yet how much higher the market values Tesla compared to these competitors. 

In 2020, Toyota alone produced more than 7 million vehicles, whereas Tesla produced just over 500,000. Yet as of February 11th 2021, Tesla’s market capitalization stands at over $800 billion, over 3x that of Toyota’s $248 billion. In fact, Tesla is currently worth more than the 9 largest automakers combined.

The point here is:

Investors have been buying into Tesla’s vision, its mission, and the impact its technology might have on the world. 

Many might view this situation as irrational and detached from Tesla’s actual balance sheet. But it nevertheless gives us a strong impression of where investor money is increasingly going, how people are making these investment decisions, and the value people place on companies with a compelling vision for a brighter future. 

It’s no coincidence that the rise of stocks like Tesla happened as more Gen Zs and millennials enter the stock market; a movement which was only accelerated by the pandemic, and probably fueled by misused stimulus checks. 

With the market crash in March, this gave these fledgling investors an entry point into the market with hopes that the price crashes were just short term discounts. Many others joined the fray as tech companies benefited from the pandemic, sparking an unexpected sustained rise in the S&P 500. 

Our data shows that after steady rises since 2017, 2020 saw the number of Gen Zs in Europe and North America owning stocks increase by around +50%. For millennials, that growth sits at +28% for both regions, so clearly the GameStop affair shouldn’t be exclusively attributed to millennials. 

Other regions where share ownership was less prevalent also saw modest growth. Although some countries stood out, like South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand, where a high proportion of existing share ownership among younger groups grew considerably. 

Shareholders versus stakeholders

These shifts in our data will greatly impact how companies are directed and controlled. 

Different countries have different systems of corporate governance. In North America, the UK and Australia, the shareholder perspective holds that the corporation’s main duty is to maximize shareholder value. 

In places like Europe and Asia, the stakeholder perspective expects governance systems to balance the interests of a firm’s stakeholders, which include shareholders alongside any other groups in society impacted by a company’s operations. In terms of sustainability, this means everyone.

In the past, the shareholder perspective has prioritized profit over environmental responsibility, creating little incentive for companies to invest in costly sustainable practices, which may have put them at a competitive disadvantage. 

When one company reduces emissions, often lowering production output, another company will just step in to fill the void.

Now, with a new wave of sustainably-minded shareholders, investing in environmentally-friendly innovation will increasingly become both a positive competitive differentiator and a way of providing shareholders with value. 

The recent short squeeze stocks were the culmination of purpose-driven and crowd-sourced investment choices with little-to-no attention to financial fundamentals. These wouldn’t have been possible without a new type of investor willing to relinquish personal due-diligence to online communities with the aim to shape the world around them. 

This riskier and less accountable style of decision-making is completely at odds with traditional investor principles.

It would be a mistake to view recent events as bizarre phenomenons or one-trick ponies. These crowd-sourced short squeezes were built on online communities and the passion of people determined to make their mark on their surroundings through collective action. Sustainability could well benefit from them. 

We’re unlikely to witness quite the same volatility seen for GameStop with ESG companies, but looking ahead, the story and meaning of a stock will have greater weight alongside a company’s financial health. These stories can capture the attention and imagination of communities who are willing to take a risk.

Look out for our upcoming blog which takes a deep dive into this new wave of investors.

Click to access our connecting the dots 2021 report

5 ways vacationers have changed in 2021

Traveling is back on the agenda, but it’ll be very different to how we remember it.

In the first 10 months of 2020 alone, the pandemic cost the tourism industry $935 billion in revenue worldwide.

For brands looking to recover and rebuild in 2021, it’s crucial to know exactly how vacationers’ mindsets have evolved. 

70% of consumers in the U.S./UK are planning on taking a vacation this year.

Using our latest Zeitgeist data, we’ve zeroed in on this audience and answered questions such as: 

  • How much do COVID concerns play a part in their vacation plans? 
  • What types of trips are they planning? 
  • And, are vaccines affecting bookings?

For much of the world, uncertainty made travel practically impossible last year.

2021 is a new story. Tourism and travel-focused brands that acknowledge this big picture are best positioned to take off once again.

1. COVID concerns govern everything. 

While the vast majority of consumers plan to take a vacation this year, it’s a bumpy ride getting them there – and we’re not just talking about turbulence. Every step of the way – from researching to returning home – COVID concerns will be on consumers’ radars.

Almost always, consumers will weigh up cost and quality above anything else before making a purchase. Nowadays, COVID concerns have become a primary consideration as well. 

For vacation planners in the U.S./UK, the state of the COVID-19 pandemic is now the most important factor to them when considering a trip. The fact that this comes 16 percentage points above the state of their personal finances is telling of how devastating the pandemic has been on the industry.

Chart: vacation planning concerns

COVID concerns continue far beyond the planning and research phase. Vacationers have greater demands of travel brands than ever before.

43% of vacation planners in the U.S./UK want travel brands to show proof of hygiene procedures. 

Accor is one brand adapting to support these changing demands. Early in the pandemic, the hospitality company launched the ALLSAFE label to give guests the assurance of a third-party verified standard of hotel cleanliness. 

With more than 95% of Accor’s worldwide network utilizing these protocols, their customers are receiving the proof they’re looking for. 

2. Holiday preferences have been redefined.

To minimize risks when traveling this year, consumers are reevaluating the types of trips they’ll take. 

Vacations will likely be shorter than they used to be, and closer to home – think along the lines of staycations and road trips. Quieter destinations will also feature heavily. Crowded cities are out, the great outdoors is in.

Chart: vacation planning priorities

For many brands, their audience hasn’t necessarily changed, but their demands have. 

For instance, a quarter of consumers in the U.S. who’ve stayed at a Holiday Inn in the last year enjoy taking staycations. Brands such as this are pivoting their strategy to tap into these trends.

IHG, owners of Holiday Inn, recently saw the growth of staycations help push their occupancy rates up from 25% to 44%.

3. Booking confidence hinges on a vaccine.

The global vaccination program accelerates every day. At the time of writing, 5.64 million doses are being administered daily across the globe. 

Most schemes focus on vaccinating older consumers first.

Understandably older – and more at risk – people are less likely to have taken a vacation last year.

But with vaccine rollouts, they’re showing a greater desire to book a trip right now. 

This isn’t surprising given the importance of access to a vaccine, as a consideration when booking a trip, increases with age.

With vaccine rollouts accelerating, the lifting of lockdowns on the horizon, and an abundance of pent up demand; older consumers are set to help many travel brands on their road to recovery.

Chart: How the Covid vaccines will affect travel

Jit Desai, Head of holidays and travel at National Express, is one of many stakeholders in the industry to have taken note of this trend.

He says: “Some of this is postponed travel carried over from last year, but there’s definitely a trend of customers being comfortable that they’ll have had their vaccination and be protected from Spring onwards, so can start to make travel plans.”

As a result, National Express has seen bookings nearly triple for spring and summer trips compared with last year, and they’re not alone.

TUI recently announced that the vaccine rollout in Britain has boosted summer bookings from those aged 50 and over, an age group accounting for 50% of all TUI’s web bookings since the end of last year. 

More likely to have been financially affected by the pandemic, their younger counterparts – Gen Z and millennials – may be more limited when it comes to booking a holiday in the foreseeable future.  

4. Vacation planners are in the research phase. 

While vaccines appear to signal light at the end of the COVID tunnel, concerns about it still govern consumers’ holiday plans. For this reason the vast majority of vacation planners remain in the research phase.

45% of vacation planners in the U.S./UK are researching right now; an additional 18% know where they’re going but are yet to book.

It’s likely that many are waiting for the opportune moment when the COVID situation has improved. At which point, their pent up dreams of a vacation will be realized, and spontaneous trips will be more popular than ever before.

With many consumers still in the research phase, travel brands must focus on being discoverable – while this may not result in immediate bookings, it’s likely to pay dividends down the road.

And there are many ways brands can do this. 

Using our harmonized datasets, we can zero in on a brands’ specific customers and explore how they look for more information about products and services online. In doing so, we uncover how they stand apart from the average consumer so that travel companies can learn where they need to be visible in this new-normal.

In the UK for example, TUI customers are 36% more likely than the average internet user to use discount sites for research. 

How about the research habits of Holiday Inn goers in the U.S.? This audience is 20% more likely than other American consumers to hear about new products via ads on social media.

It’s easy to be disheartened by low bookings, but travel brands should do what they can to stay visible. Consumers will come. What’s important is they know where to book when they do.

5. Loyalty is more important than ever before.

The vacationer of 2021 is cautious and wary of traveling again, so it’s paramount they trust travel brands.

32% of vacation planners in the U.S./UK say using a travel provider they trust is important to them when booking a trip.

For vacation planners, this is more important than going back to a place they know (25%). In these times of uncertainty, they’re more likely to put their trust in brands they know rather than their own previous experiences.

Loyalty programs must assure their members that they still value them amid this travel turmoil, because now more than ever, vacationers are ready to turn to them for support.

One scheme doing just that is the Marriott Bonvoy loyalty program. While other programs have generally reduced the requirements to achieve elite status, Marriott Bonvoy has chosen a path that values and rewards existing status customers. Every loyalty program member who holds existing status points will be credited with half the nights required to re-qualify for this status next year.

As vacation preferences change, brands should reach out to new consumers, but not at the expense of forgetting their loyal customers. For some brands, the latter will be key to kick-starting bookings once again.

While last year was a great time of uncertainty for travel brands, 2021 represents opportunity. 

And though the industry landscape is different to what they’ve known before, travel brands that tap into consumers’ changing demands, and make them work for them, will be the ones best set for takeoff.

Connect with consumers: a picture of devices and consumers in 2021

Spanish soccer’s American dream: profiling LaLiga fans in the U.S.

LaLiga fan holding football

Every sports fan loves a derby. 

But when the biggest derby in the world features players from your club or national team, you sit up and watch.

In October 2020, Sergiño Dest became the first American soccer player to take part in El Clasico, the fiercely contested match between Barcelona and Real Madrid. 

Dest was part of a generation of United States Men’s National Soccer Team players staking their claim to starting spots in Europe’s top clubs. 

As time’s gone on, the flame ignited between the U.S. and LaLiga begins to burn brighter.

FC Barcelona and Real Madrid rank third and forth among America’s favourite teams. Outside of international competitions, LaLiga sits second for most watched foreign soccer leagues too. So it’s safe to say there’s a healthy appetite for Spanish soccer across the pond. 

Using both GWI Core and GWI USA data sets, we showcase Spanish soccer’s opportunity in the U.S. by putting the American LaLiga fan under the spotlight.

To capture their hearts, look local.

A campaign launched in 2019, named Project North America, aimed to feature regular LaLiga matches for a total of 15 years. And although this tactic led to fandom, it received a mixed reception because the real-world exposure was limited to pre-season.

The project was begging for a more targeted approach.

By focusing on specific regions, clubs can approach their core markets with purpose. 

No two LaLiga fans are alike, which is why segmentation plays a key role in giving an enhanced and refined brand experience moving forward.

If you can grasp how they’re feeling, you can tap into what really drives them. Add in their lifestyles, purchase intentions, and what they think about brands, and you can make better calls on your commercial partners. 

With all these ingredients, you’ll end up with a holistic audience profiling approach, leading to new revenue streams, and ultimately – a shot at the American dream.

To get you started, here’s a quick summary of what to know about LaLiga fans right now.

They’re avid gamers

LaLiga fans in the U.S., defined in our platform as internet users who express an interest in the league or regularly watch it on TV or online, aren’t just about soccer. 

Their interests span into other sectors, giving rise to new partnerships, advertising placement and product ranges. 

Let’s start with their passion for gaming.

Esports

Just over a third of LaLiga fans in the U.S. are interested in esports. 

They’re averaging over twof hours a day on games consoles, providing a window to drive fan engagement. Their go-to genres are action-adventure, shooters and sports – something to bear in mind when choosing your next partner. 

The main motivation for gaming is to connect with friends – making it an important passtime in periods of lowered social contact. Twitch and YouTube Gaming are regular reference points too, with LaLiga fans more than twice as likely as the average American to share personal footage online. 

Beyond the console

But it’s not all about console gaming. 

Apps present a great opportunity for engagement through entertainment, so clubs should look to enhance their digital experiences. Soccer has become more than gameday and clubs now have to act as media houses moving forward.

Creating these in partnership with sponsors can be seen as a creative step in the purchase journey – 21% of these fans have played a branded game in the last month and they’re over twice as likely to purchase a product to gain access to the community around it. 

They’re tech-savvy.

Partnering with a business tech supplier is standard practice for clubs, with Man City and Cisco coming to mind. 

New tech purchases

They’re two and a half times more likely than the average American to buy new tech products immediately. 

They’re more than willing to buy products when prices are at their highest.

They believe digital plays a big role in improving their overall health and wellbeing too, so clubs should opt for a brand with a relevant product line and similar ethos to encourage them to buy premium products.

Mobile usage and tech

Mobile remains their staple device, but a new smartwatch is at the top of the wish list. 

They’re no strangers to using tech to enhance their everyday lives. For example many track their calorie consumption and they’re 92% more likely to search for online videos to help whip up meals. 

Now is the time to utilize players to help their fitness journey – sharing tips in the kitchen and tricks in the gym through video will immerse LaLiga fans in the soccer player lifestyle. 

When compared to the average American, they’re around 3 times more likely to have posted opinions about technology products online in the last month. This plays a big part in their decision-making too, often using independent reviews as a reference. 

We already mentioned the importance of community in gaming, so developing fan forums with a partner-led agenda can ignite brand discussions and provide a platform for social interaction. 

They’re fashionistas

American LaLiga fans are into fashion, and it plays a big role in their lives. 

They aim to stand out from the crowd, and their clothing helps them achieve this. Finding exclusive products and designer labels is a must, with Gucci already sitting in a quarter of their wardrobes. 

This audience is 35% more likely to want brands to be trendy, which should encourage clubs to be more inventive when it comes to merchandise.

To jump on this trend, clubs will want to know how and where fans are searching for (and buying) new products. 

We already know they’re techies, so it fits that apps are their go-to sources of product research. Clubs can look to build on their consumer contact by using them as virtual showrooms. 

Introduce a splash of customizability and a touch of AI, and you’ll be in favour. 

The opportunity is vast

Fortunately for clubs, LaLiga fans in America have a wide set of interests that run very deep. 

This means they can diversify their message, enhance revenue streams, and tailor product ranges safe in the knowledge it will have a powerful effect.

Whilst the above gives you a flavor of what this group (on the whole) is interested in, we have to stress the importance of localized marketing here. 

Creating a truly customized experience for your specific fan group will have an even bigger impact, and it’ll save bundles of cash in the long run. 

The trick is investing in getting to know your fans – something you can do with the right insights.

access our new american consumers report